BarcampBlock abuzz
BarCamp Block was extraordinary — I spent Saturday morning and afternoon there. (Family commitments kept me from the Saturday evening and Sunday events or I’d have stayed all the way through.) This “unconference” was a free event, with “programming” supplied ad hoc by the attendees themselves, and a schedule devised on the fly at the start of the weekend.
Sounds like chaos? “Cult of the Amateur” mediocrity? No way. Think instead of the energy, ideas and conviviality that can flow from a crowd of smart people when they’re given a chance to make things up as they go along.
The event was huge — hundreds of people gathered primarily around one block in downtown Palo Alto centered on the SocialText offices. No one could possibly have attended more than a fraction of the sessions. Three highlights for me were:
- A discussion among about a dozen people at the Institute for the Future office about coping with RSS overload. This was started by someone who works at a company that’s producing a sort of personal (or collaborative) filter for your RSS feeds (so you can train your feed reader to only show you posts on a set of topics that you’re interested in). I have no use for such a product; when I subscribe to a feed I’m happy if the blogger surprises me with interesting stuff that I didn’t know I was interested in (and that I’d never see with a feed filtered by preset criteria). But the idea led to a good exchange in the room, and helped crystallize my thinking on a feed-reader feature that would make a big difference (for me, anyway!). I’ll post separately on that.
- Tantek Celik led an open discussion about the state of microformats, a subject I’m increasingly interested in. This is one of those Web-technology phenomena that at the moment is intelligible almost exclusively to geeks, but I think that — like blogs or RSS — it will become much more widely useful and adopted in the next few years. I’ll also be writing more on the subject later.
- Finally, Brad Fitzpatrick, David Recordon and Joseph Smarr led a session on “Opening the Social Graph.” They were talking about a pragmatic, we-could-build-it-now solution to the much-discussed problem on the “social web” of proliferating networks. Who wants to join another social networking site when, each time you do that, you have to painstakingly rebuild your list of “friends” or relationships? Isn’t there a way to make this information portable? LiveJournal founder Fitzpatrick’s recent paper on this subject proposed one approach. At BarCamp Fitzpatrick and his collaborators talked about setting up a nonprofit organization that would serve as the hub for the backend data services his solution would require. Another fascinating subject worth more future in-depth posting. (No one seems to have posted notes on the session, so I’ll try to add mine to the conference wiki soon.)
So there you have it: I spent less than a full day and came away with my head buzzing and three major areas of material to pursue more deeply. I don’t think any of the old-fashioned, CEOs-on-stage conferences I’ve been to match that record.
August 20th, 2007 at 9:49 am
[...] Scott Rosenberg: [...]
August 23rd, 2007 at 4:45 pm
I’m interested in RSS overload from the point of view of there’s some streams of water that you only want to dip your toes in.
Some blogs resonate to the point where I want to read everything, others I’d rather have an agent give me the highlights.
Of course, I guess the real answer would be to skip over the parts I don’t like :)
August 23rd, 2007 at 7:51 pm
[...] as I mentioned in my BarCamp post, is my idea for a feature that RSS readers should but don’t (as far as I know) have: a sort [...]
September 3rd, 2007 at 6:59 pm
Scott said: “I have no use for such a product; when I subscribe to a feed I’m happy if the blogger surprises me with interesting stuff that I didn’t know I was interested in …”
I agree completely. One of the hardest things for me to adjust to, and one of the things I miss about reading print papers and magazines, is the loss of serendipity. When I used to have to read serially, I’d often come across something I never would have thought of. With feed readers, it’s bad enough that I’m getting pretty much only stuff I know I’m interested in; pre-selecting based on tags would only aggravate the problem.
Don’t get me wrong. I like Google notifications, the HuffPo’s facility for notifications of specific posters, etc. But the discovery of a new nugget blows all of these away.