Wordyard

Hand-forged posts since 2002

Scott Rosenberg

  • About
  • Greatest hits
  • 
  • 
  • 
  • 

Archives

Wordyard / Dreaming in Code / A year of Dreaming in Code

A year of Dreaming in Code

January 18, 2008 by Scott Rosenberg 4 Comments

I can’t believe that it’s been a whole year since my book came out (the official publication date was Jan. 16, 2007). The paperback will be out the third week in February, with a new afterword that carries the story through the release of Chandler’s Preview edition. The recent restructuring and cutbacks of the project are foreshadowed in this section. But they happened way past the time we could have added material, which is too bad — but I guess that’s one reason that I have a blog.

I’m proud to say that Dreaming in Code also recently went into its fifth hardcover printing. We did pretty well for a book about a Beckettian software project.

This is a good moment to thank Mark Bernstein for his warm review of the book, which posted over the holidays, so I caught up with it late. I’ve met Bernstein only a couple of times — many years ago at one of the Digital Storytelling Festivals in Colorado, and then once again at one of the Bloggercons. He’s a formidable innovator and leader in the field of serious hypertext fiction, and a software entrepreneur as well, both under the umbrella of his company Eastgate Systems. One of Eastgate’s products is a Mac-based PIM called Tinderbox, one of the very few programs I know of that fulfills at least a portion of the ambitions that Chandler set out with.

Anyway, here’s a bit from his post:

On this framework, Rosenberg hangs a masterful and engaging survey of the thinking that underlies contemporary software engineering. This overview will have lasting importance, as I think it’s destined be the textbook that introduces a generation of students throughout the world to the professional practice of software and to its founding voices — Brooks and the Mythical Man Month, Parnas, Joy, the postmoderns, the agilists.

He also offers some fair criticism:

What Rosenberg doesn’t capture — because Chandler seldom captured it — is the way software actually gets written: in slow, steady segments, in dashing sprints, in long nights of inspiration, in weeks of staring at the screen, but always — in the end — by one or two people working to get something to work. In practice, this usually means one or two people imagining how it might work, and then making it happen. There wasn’t enough of this in Chandler, and when it did happen, it too often happened to infrastructure, deep in foundations that were expected to underpin grand structures that were never built.

But concludes:

To have carved such a fine, generous, and useful book out of the debris [of Chandler] is a very fine accomplishment indeed.

I’m grateful for such a response. Bernstein has also posted some fascinating ideas on what he calls “NeoVictorian Computing,” which I keep intending to post on. Soon!
[tags]chandler, mark bernstein, tinderbox[/tags]

Post Revisions:

There are no revisions for this post.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit
  • Email
  • Print

Filed Under: Dreaming in Code

REPORT AN ERROR

Get Scott’s weekly Wordyard email

Notes from me and the week's collection of links and quotes. No spam, and if I ever sell this list or send you a "sponsored email" you'll know that I'm gone and some alien has adopted my identity.

Comments

  1. Andrew Brown

    January 18, 2008 at 4:06 am

    What a thoughtful review! It has made me want tinderbox for Windows, if that ever does come out.

  2. Tim

    January 19, 2008 at 12:29 am

    I’ve been waiting for Tinderbox for Windows for years, so I would say don’t hold your breath (but I haven’t given up either).

  3. Charley

    January 21, 2008 at 3:46 pm

    How bout instead of waiting for “Tinderbox for windows.” get yourselves a “Mac for Tinderbox

  4. Pierre

    January 23, 2008 at 2:17 pm

    Those waiting for Tinderbox for Windows can try SQLNotes right now (totally free while in beta). It uses the Ecco concept of outlined items with a data grid, multiple notepads, user-defined fields and forms, etc as a way of organizing your information. As Ecco, it can manage tasks, calendar, contacts, notes.

    Unlike Tinderbox, it is multi-user ready (simultaneous) with field-value level granularity, it is based on a database (Tinderbox is XML based), so performance will not be affected as it grows.

    Its data is accessible to other apps and it supports calculations, pivot tables and charts, rich-text in the outline and in a separate word-processing-like pane, journals, powerful HTML export/mail-merge facilities, and web-like linking between items. The UI is modern MS Office-like. Latest version adds GTD features and system-wide shortcut to add information/web-clippings from other apps. More info at http://www.sqlnotes.net and http://sqlnotes.wikispaces.com/

Post a comment Cancel reply

Creative Commons License Wordyard by Scott Rosenberg is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.