<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s Twitter&#8217;s past, and what&#8217;s it&#8217;s future?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitter business models in the fast and the long</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11697</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter business models in the fast and the long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 18:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11697</guid>
		<description>[...] then responded that Twitter as it exists today isn&#8217;t really intended to be archival. Scott Rosenberg puts it well: &#8220;Twitter is great at &#8216;now.&#8217; But as far as I can tell, it&#8217;s lousy at [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] then responded that Twitter as it exists today isn&#8217;t really intended to be archival. Scott Rosenberg puts it well: &#8220;Twitter is great at &#8216;now.&#8217; But as far as I can tell, it&#8217;s lousy at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 questions for the author of &#8216;Say Everything&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11495</link>
		<dc:creator>7 questions for the author of &#8216;Say Everything&#8217;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11495</guid>
		<description>[...] we don&#8217;t yet really know how well a Tweet will serve as a reference point in the future (as I wrote a little while back). Blog posts have known persistence and long-term discoverability. It would be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we don&#8217;t yet really know how well a Tweet will serve as a reference point in the future (as I wrote a little while back). Blog posts have known persistence and long-term discoverability. It would be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yahoo&#8217;s Delicious adds a little Twitter &#124; kbbs tech</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11460</link>
		<dc:creator>Yahoo&#8217;s Delicious adds a little Twitter &#124; kbbs tech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 01:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11460</guid>
		<description>[...] In general, social bookmarking services have also failed to surface the data that they have stored in ways that allow for useful and serendipitous exploration. This latest announcement tries to do something about that by making use of data from Twitter, a service that&#8217;s all about the now. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In general, social bookmarking services have also failed to surface the data that they have stored in ways that allow for useful and serendipitous exploration. This latest announcement tries to do something about that by making use of data from Twitter, a service that&#8217;s all about the now. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jv</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11244</link>
		<dc:creator>jv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 19:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11244</guid>
		<description>Sorry, who cares if one company controls Twitter or if they make money or not?  It&#039;s entertainment to beat back the darkness or boredom for people who have money for computers and cell phones and have the time to play with it.  Like Demi thoughts matter?

People twittering from the street in Iran is an interesting happening that no dictator will ever allow again (Ask China about controlling the Internet and who runs cell towers in Iran?)  It was replaced the next week by the death of a freak.  It was great fun to know when bizzaro OD&#039;d first.  You can sneer at the media and be a superior know it person first.  And Arnie has a big knife!  Wow, what a dork - we who know that before anybody else are important.  Forget the fact that he showed off his big tool by choice to people who choose to be shown at his whim and under his control.  He is a movie actor after all!

Twitter is a fun way to pass the time - another entertainment game changer like movies with THX sound.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, who cares if one company controls Twitter or if they make money or not?  It&#8217;s entertainment to beat back the darkness or boredom for people who have money for computers and cell phones and have the time to play with it.  Like Demi thoughts matter?</p>
<p>People twittering from the street in Iran is an interesting happening that no dictator will ever allow again (Ask China about controlling the Internet and who runs cell towers in Iran?)  It was replaced the next week by the death of a freak.  It was great fun to know when bizzaro OD&#8217;d first.  You can sneer at the media and be a superior know it person first.  And Arnie has a big knife!  Wow, what a dork &#8211; we who know that before anybody else are important.  Forget the fact that he showed off his big tool by choice to people who choose to be shown at his whim and under his control.  He is a movie actor after all!</p>
<p>Twitter is a fun way to pass the time &#8211; another entertainment game changer like movies with THX sound.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosenberg on Twitter &#171; Scrawled in Wax</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11212</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosenberg on Twitter &#171; Scrawled in Wax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11212</guid>
		<description>[...] second post thinks about Twitter&#8217;s future and its problems with both scalability and also the difficulty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] second post thinks about Twitter&#8217;s future and its problems with both scalability and also the difficulty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subhankar Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11206</link>
		<dc:creator>Subhankar Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 03:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11206</guid>
		<description>Companies, and investors that are depending on Twitter APIs are there for a &#039;good&#039; ride without knowing Twitter&#039;s business model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Companies, and investors that are depending on Twitter APIs are there for a &#8216;good&#8217; ride without knowing Twitter&#8217;s business model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Weir</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11202</link>
		<dc:creator>David Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 23:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11202</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott. I believe what the guy I quoted meant about Twitter being &quot;the New Internet&quot; is that it is attracting unprecedented attention from developers who are trying to create killer apps that improve Twitter...he also was saying that the paradigm of real-time information is as revolutionary as the Internet itself was back in the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott. I believe what the guy I quoted meant about Twitter being &#8220;the New Internet&#8221; is that it is attracting unprecedented attention from developers who are trying to create killer apps that improve Twitter&#8230;he also was saying that the paradigm of real-time information is as revolutionary as the Internet itself was back in the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Winer</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11198</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Winer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11198</guid>
		<description>Scott, it&#039;s the developers who don&#039;t want to anger TwitterCorp. Users don&#039;t think the company cares what they do, probably correctly. 

Some platform vendors are more vindictive than others. Apple in the early 90s was a total police state. Tolerated no dissension. Microsoft at the same time seemed to like it when you criticized them, at least the groups that were in competitive markets like Word, Excel and later Internet Explorer.

On the scale of past platform vendors, Twitter is actually pretty good. I criticize regularly but that hasn&#039;t stopped me from getting help when I&#039;ve needed it. They are very responsive, and professional. And I&#039;m not saying that to suck up! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, it&#8217;s the developers who don&#8217;t want to anger TwitterCorp. Users don&#8217;t think the company cares what they do, probably correctly. </p>
<p>Some platform vendors are more vindictive than others. Apple in the early 90s was a total police state. Tolerated no dissension. Microsoft at the same time seemed to like it when you criticized them, at least the groups that were in competitive markets like Word, Excel and later Internet Explorer.</p>
<p>On the scale of past platform vendors, Twitter is actually pretty good. I criticize regularly but that hasn&#8217;t stopped me from getting help when I&#8217;ve needed it. They are very responsive, and professional. And I&#8217;m not saying that to suck up! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathew A. Koeneker</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11194</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathew A. Koeneker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11194</guid>
		<description>Just do what I do and use Feedburner and the RSS of your tweetstream and @reply Tweetstream and e-mail to your Evernote account (in my case) or wherever you want. Then they can do whatever they want and you still have your data. Is that over simplifying things?
mak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just do what I do and use Feedburner and the RSS of your tweetstream and @reply Tweetstream and e-mail to your Evernote account (in my case) or wherever you want. Then they can do whatever they want and you still have your data. Is that over simplifying things?<br />
mak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/07/21/twitters-past-and-future/comment-page-1/#comment-11191</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 17:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2184#comment-11191</guid>
		<description>I have an account on identi.ca but the reason I haven&#039;t switched is probably the same reason many others haven&#039;t. It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t want to anger TwitterCorp.; I doubt they&#039;re paying any attention to me. It&#039;s that Twitter is where the people are. It had a big head start, and for now, it&#039;s t he beneficiary of a simple network effect that&#039;s hard to counter. 

If I were less of a pragmatist I guess I&#039;d switch anyway. Instead, I&#039;m still using Twitter, but happy to have the discussion about its problems and limitations on Twitter itself, as well as here on my blog, which I still think of as the center of my online communications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an account on identi.ca but the reason I haven&#8217;t switched is probably the same reason many others haven&#8217;t. It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t want to anger TwitterCorp.; I doubt they&#8217;re paying any attention to me. It&#8217;s that Twitter is where the people are. It had a big head start, and for now, it&#8217;s t he beneficiary of a simple network effect that&#8217;s hard to counter. </p>
<p>If I were less of a pragmatist I guess I&#8217;d switch anyway. Instead, I&#8217;m still using Twitter, but happy to have the discussion about its problems and limitations on Twitter itself, as well as here on my blog, which I still think of as the center of my online communications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
