<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How charging for articles could hobble the future of journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:26:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Something there is that doesn&#8217;t love a paywall</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-11878</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Something there is that doesn&#8217;t love a paywall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-11878</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m exasperated too, but I won&#8217;t join the &#8220;put up or shut up&#8221; crowd because I&#8217;d hate to see the further ghettoization of oldfashioned journalistic expertise on the Web. New models for news are sprouting on the Web every day. The journalism profession has a wealth of expertise and knowhow; the support of a dying industry&#8217;s paychecks will continue to dwindle, but the expertise can still be transmitted to a new generation of journalism ventures. That won&#8217;t happen If major media outlets wall themselves off from the Web. They will cut off not only their revenue but also their chance to influence the practice of journalism as it evolves online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m exasperated too, but I won&#8217;t join the &#8220;put up or shut up&#8221; crowd because I&#8217;d hate to see the further ghettoization of oldfashioned journalistic expertise on the Web. New models for news are sprouting on the Web every day. The journalism profession has a wealth of expertise and knowhow; the support of a dying industry&#8217;s paychecks will continue to dwindle, but the expertise can still be transmitted to a new generation of journalism ventures. That won&#8217;t happen If major media outlets wall themselves off from the Web. They will cut off not only their revenue but also their chance to influence the practice of journalism as it evolves online. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All is flux</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10743</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All is flux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10743</guid>
		<description>[...] the next time news executives gather to ponder their options they should set aside a session for a few [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the next time news executives gather to ponder their options they should set aside a session for a few [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Once more into the pay-wall breach: No gravedancing edition</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10574</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Once more into the pay-wall breach: No gravedancing edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10574</guid>
		<description>[...] offers a summary of a white paper that the American Press Institute provided to attendees of the recent newspaper execs&#8217; conclave. (The paper doesn&#8217;t seem to be available on the API [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] offers a summary of a white paper that the American Press Institute provided to attendees of the recent newspaper execs&#8217; conclave. (The paper doesn&#8217;t seem to be available on the API [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve, boston MA</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10531</link>
		<dc:creator>steve, boston MA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 17:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10531</guid>
		<description>two points:

1) the quintessential capitalists, who are genetically speculative and for maximum profit at all cost, hate the likes of craigs list and ebay where used items recycled infinitely by consumers themselves and thereby driving profit minimal.  this trend will only eccelerate until e-commerce is done by small biz fashin and just barely profitable enough.  unless the fat cats monopolize the internet, that is.

2) online news outlets will need and hire many of the capable current newspaper editors as aggregators / digesters / interpreters / commentators of (...  and will provide (and pay for) links to the direct sources as well of course...)  much of the investigative data gathered by local volunteer amateurs and their sites.  finally, news and information will be free from the iron grip over the news production and distribution by the tiny minority with particular agenda.  Plough ahead, brothers and sisters of the world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two points:</p>
<p>1) the quintessential capitalists, who are genetically speculative and for maximum profit at all cost, hate the likes of craigs list and ebay where used items recycled infinitely by consumers themselves and thereby driving profit minimal.  this trend will only eccelerate until e-commerce is done by small biz fashin and just barely profitable enough.  unless the fat cats monopolize the internet, that is.</p>
<p>2) online news outlets will need and hire many of the capable current newspaper editors as aggregators / digesters / interpreters / commentators of (&#8230;  and will provide (and pay for) links to the direct sources as well of course&#8230;)  much of the investigative data gathered by local volunteer amateurs and their sites.  finally, news and information will be free from the iron grip over the news production and distribution by the tiny minority with particular agenda.  Plough ahead, brothers and sisters of the world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Charging For Articles Could Hobble The Future of Journalism [Voices] &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10518</link>
		<dc:creator>How Charging For Articles Could Hobble The Future of Journalism [Voices] &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 06:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10518</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest of this post on the original site   Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest of this post on the original site   Article   Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspaper paywalls and classifieds : Mobiya Classifieds</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10516</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspaper paywalls and classifieds : Mobiya Classifieds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 06:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10516</guid>
		<description>[...] Must read opinion post &amp; comments about the future of newspapers. More. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Must read opinion post &amp; comments about the future of newspapers. More. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Take 2 on newspaper executives&#8217; secret meeting &#171; Transforming the Gaz</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10508</link>
		<dc:creator>Take 2 on newspaper executives&#8217; secret meeting &#171; Transforming the Gaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 20:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10508</guid>
		<description>[...] I didn&#8217;t actually know what was happening, but was writing based on some blogs that were mostly based on speculation or rumor or on the agenda for the meeting, which James Warren of The Atlantic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I didn&#8217;t actually know what was happening, but was writing based on some blogs that were mostly based on speculation or rumor or on the agenda for the meeting, which James Warren of The Atlantic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s not the price &#8212; it&#8217;s the wall that hurts &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10505</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s not the price &#8212; it&#8217;s the wall that hurts &#187; Nieman Journalism Lab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 16:55:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10505</guid>
		<description>[...] Rosenberg clarifies an earlier post and, in the process, makes an important point about why so many are wary of The Wall: &#8220;When [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rosenberg clarifies an earlier post and, in the process, makes an important point about why so many are wary of The Wall: &#8220;When [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How charging for articles could hobble the future of journalism &#124; Urban Onramps</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10496</link>
		<dc:creator>How charging for articles could hobble the future of journalism &#124; Urban Onramps</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10496</guid>
		<description>[...] SCOTT ROSENBERG: &#8220;We are, then, nearing a moment of real decision on the part of the beleaguered newspaper industry, a genuine fork in the road&#8230;&#8221; from How charging for articles could hobble the future of journalism [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] SCOTT ROSENBERG: &#8220;We are, then, nearing a moment of real decision on the part of the beleaguered newspaper industry, a genuine fork in the road&#8230;&#8221; from How charging for articles could hobble the future of journalism [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It’s not the pay, it’s the wall &#124; Tech-monkey.info Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/28/charging-for-articles/comment-page-1/#comment-10491</link>
		<dc:creator>It’s not the pay, it’s the wall &#124; Tech-monkey.info Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=2006#comment-10491</guid>
		<description>[...] itself and the impact of the steps taken to make sure people pay. I was guilty of this in my &#8220;charging for articles&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] itself and the impact of the steps taken to make sure people pay. I was guilty of this in my &#8220;charging for articles&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
