<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yesterday, AOL/TimeWarner; today, Twitter and&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/06/yesterday-aoltimewarner-today-twitter-and/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/06/yesterday-aoltimewarner-today-twitter-and/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Salon.com IPO: It was ten years ago today &#124; Tech-monkey.info Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/06/yesterday-aoltimewarner-today-twitter-and/comment-page-1/#comment-10750</link>
		<dc:creator>Salon.com IPO: It was ten years ago today &#124; Tech-monkey.info Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1952#comment-10750</guid>
		<description>[...] As I&#8217;ve written, during the dotcom bubble I was a father of newborn twins, and I spent much of the era in a haze of caffeine and adrenaline. Meanwhile, the pace of decision-making at Salon at the time was crazy &#8212; we were one small precinct of an entire industrial outbreak of madness. One conclusion I&#8217;vew drawn from that experience for myself is: never rely on a vehicle that&#8217;s moving too fast to steer. (And no, to answer a question some will probably have, I never made a cent on the offering myself: insiders weren&#8217;t allowed to sell stock at first, and by the time we were allowed to, the price had already begun to plummet. Besides, I really did believe in the company&#8217;s future.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I&#8217;ve written, during the dotcom bubble I was a father of newborn twins, and I spent much of the era in a haze of caffeine and adrenaline. Meanwhile, the pace of decision-making at Salon at the time was crazy &#8212; we were one small precinct of an entire industrial outbreak of madness. One conclusion I&#8217;vew drawn from that experience for myself is: never rely on a vehicle that&#8217;s moving too fast to steer. (And no, to answer a question some will probably have, I never made a cent on the offering myself: insiders weren&#8217;t allowed to sell stock at first, and by the time we were allowed to, the price had already begun to plummet. Besides, I really did believe in the company&#8217;s future.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Salon.com IPO: It was ten years ago today</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/06/yesterday-aoltimewarner-today-twitter-and/comment-page-1/#comment-10748</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Salon.com IPO: It was ten years ago today</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1952#comment-10748</guid>
		<description>[...] As I&#8217;ve written, during the dotcom bubble I was a father of newborn twins, and I spent much of the era in a haze of caffeine and adrenaline. Meanwhile, the pace of decision-making at Salon at the time was crazy &#8212; we were one small precinct of an entire industrial outbreak of madness. One conclusion I&#8217;vew drawn from that experience for myself is: never rely on a vehicle that&#8217;s moving too fast to steer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I&#8217;ve written, during the dotcom bubble I was a father of newborn twins, and I spent much of the era in a haze of caffeine and adrenaline. Meanwhile, the pace of decision-making at Salon at the time was crazy &#8212; we were one small precinct of an entire industrial outbreak of madness. One conclusion I&#8217;vew drawn from that experience for myself is: never rely on a vehicle that&#8217;s moving too fast to steer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/06/yesterday-aoltimewarner-today-twitter-and/comment-page-1/#comment-10204</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1952#comment-10204</guid>
		<description>just pre-ordered say anything.  congratulations on getting it out!  looking forward to more from you here now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just pre-ordered say anything.  congratulations on getting it out!  looking forward to more from you here now :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/06/yesterday-aoltimewarner-today-twitter-and/comment-page-1/#comment-10191</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1952#comment-10191</guid>
		<description>Right: They called it a merger but technically AOL was &quot;taking over&quot; Time Warner since it had over 50% of the deal; its stock was -- at that brief shining (hah!) moment -- worth so crazily much. 

However, that moment passed quickly, and the net effect of the deal was that AOL ended up owned by Time Warner, so from today&#039;s vantage I think it&#039;s reasonable to say that TW bought AOL. They traded enormous amounts of their company&#039;s net worth for AOL. Much of it ended up getting written down in subsequent years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right: They called it a merger but technically AOL was &#8220;taking over&#8221; Time Warner since it had over 50% of the deal; its stock was &#8212; at that brief shining (hah!) moment &#8212; worth so crazily much. </p>
<p>However, that moment passed quickly, and the net effect of the deal was that AOL ended up owned by Time Warner, so from today&#8217;s vantage I think it&#8217;s reasonable to say that TW bought AOL. They traded enormous amounts of their company&#8217;s net worth for AOL. Much of it ended up getting written down in subsequent years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/05/06/yesterday-aoltimewarner-today-twitter-and/comment-page-1/#comment-10190</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 20:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1952#comment-10190</guid>
		<description>I agree with everything you say here except for one thing...  AOL bought Time Warner, not the other way around.  I was in Dulles the day it happened and remember coming in that morning, hearing the news and creating a little mental list of all the things &quot;we&quot; owned now (Batman, Superman, etc).  The old guard at Time Warner staged the coup afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with everything you say here except for one thing&#8230;  AOL bought Time Warner, not the other way around.  I was in Dulles the day it happened and remember coming in that morning, hearing the news and creating a little mental list of all the things &#8220;we&#8221; owned now (Batman, Superman, etc).  The old guard at Time Warner staged the coup afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
