<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySpace and Geocities &#8212; separated at birth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/23/myspace-and-geocities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/23/myspace-and-geocities/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/23/myspace-and-geocities/comment-page-1/#comment-10215</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 18:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1949#comment-10215</guid>
		<description>There are a few people crying for the relic of a bygone era:
http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Geocities</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a few people crying for the relic of a bygone era:<br />
<a href="http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Geocities" rel="nofollow">http://www.archiveteam.org/index.php?title=Geocities</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/23/myspace-and-geocities/comment-page-1/#comment-10129</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:53:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1949#comment-10129</guid>
		<description>Mmm.. No. Or rather, maybe. Social networks do something valuable that UseNet and the old COLS used to do that the general Internat does poorly; sustain connections among people. There are a lot of reasons to loathe MySpace and FaceBook and their ilk, but there are some very positive reasons to think that something survives here:

1. Email is broken and inundated with spam. Facebook messages are opt-in, and hence more spam-defensible. I know people who do not respond to email and only to social network messages now.

2. Google is broken. Searches now bring up links SEO-optimized by asshole marketeers, instead of relevant information. &quot;The Internet&quot; no longer gets you what you want, without a whole love of mining. Social networks don&#039;t provide a direct replacement, but viral spread among friend communities replicates the kind of exponential growth we used to see on the Internet when something cool appears, and no longer do, because relevant search words are instantly hijacked by marketing dweebs.

This isn&#039;t analogous to Geocities; it&#039;s more analogous to Compuserve, MySpace, Facebook, and their ilk are congeries of millions of communities, not just ways to make an easy website. The problem they face is the same problem the early Internet faced; they have no viable, obvious business model. Compuserve had subscription income; the social networks are stuck with ads, at appallingly low CPMs.

Yet they provide real value to their users. and I have to believe there&#039;s a way to capture enough of the value to make for business viability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mmm.. No. Or rather, maybe. Social networks do something valuable that UseNet and the old COLS used to do that the general Internat does poorly; sustain connections among people. There are a lot of reasons to loathe MySpace and FaceBook and their ilk, but there are some very positive reasons to think that something survives here:</p>
<p>1. Email is broken and inundated with spam. Facebook messages are opt-in, and hence more spam-defensible. I know people who do not respond to email and only to social network messages now.</p>
<p>2. Google is broken. Searches now bring up links SEO-optimized by asshole marketeers, instead of relevant information. &#8220;The Internet&#8221; no longer gets you what you want, without a whole love of mining. Social networks don&#8217;t provide a direct replacement, but viral spread among friend communities replicates the kind of exponential growth we used to see on the Internet when something cool appears, and no longer do, because relevant search words are instantly hijacked by marketing dweebs.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t analogous to Geocities; it&#8217;s more analogous to Compuserve, MySpace, Facebook, and their ilk are congeries of millions of communities, not just ways to make an easy website. The problem they face is the same problem the early Internet faced; they have no viable, obvious business model. Compuserve had subscription income; the social networks are stuck with ads, at appallingly low CPMs.</p>
<p>Yet they provide real value to their users. and I have to believe there&#8217;s a way to capture enough of the value to make for business viability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: April 24th, 2009 - Part 2 &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/23/myspace-and-geocities/comment-page-1/#comment-10088</link>
		<dc:creator>IRC: #boycottnovell @ FreeNode: April 24th, 2009 - Part 2 &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1949#comment-10088</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8212; victims of the second great depression: MySpace and Geocities — separated at birth &lt; http://www.wordyard.com/2009/&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8212; victims of the second great depression: MySpace and Geocities — separated at birth &lt; <a href="http://www.wordyard.com/2009/&#8230" rel="nofollow">http://www.wordyard.com/2009/&#8230</a>; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phill</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/23/myspace-and-geocities/comment-page-1/#comment-10068</link>
		<dc:creator>Phill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1949#comment-10068</guid>
		<description>Actually, the first thought that passed my mind was what was going to happen to all of that prime web archeology they still host. 

I think people of the future should be exposed to our old homepages, even if they can&#039;t understand our nostalgia for &quot;under construction&quot; animated gifs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the first thought that passed my mind was what was going to happen to all of that prime web archeology they still host. </p>
<p>I think people of the future should be exposed to our old homepages, even if they can&#8217;t understand our nostalgia for &#8220;under construction&#8221; animated gifs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
