<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mark Penn&#8217;s fuzzy pro-blogging stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10128</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 03:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10128</guid>
		<description>Oh , total horseshit. According to Google Analytics, my blog is getting 67,000+ uniques a month, which is at least within striking distance of the 100k he claims generates $22k in revenue.  I estimate monthly ad revenue (plus transaction revenue from purchasers of games we link to via an affiliate program) at around $40/month. (Not $40k, $40, as in two Jacksons; admittedly, I blog on an obscure topic.) Hosting at $100/month (which maybe I could reduce, but I&#039;m old school and like having control over my own server), plus I actually pay a pittance to some of my contributors... It&#039;s a hobby, it&#039;s not a source of positive income, let alone a living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh , total horseshit. According to Google Analytics, my blog is getting 67,000+ uniques a month, which is at least within striking distance of the 100k he claims generates $22k in revenue.  I estimate monthly ad revenue (plus transaction revenue from purchasers of games we link to via an affiliate program) at around $40/month. (Not $40k, $40, as in two Jacksons; admittedly, I blog on an obscure topic.) Hosting at $100/month (which maybe I could reduce, but I&#8217;m old school and like having control over my own server), plus I actually pay a pittance to some of my contributors&#8230; It&#8217;s a hobby, it&#8217;s not a source of positive income, let alone a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week’s Links &#124; Direct Help from Business Developers</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10100</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week’s Links &#124; Direct Help from Business Developers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10100</guid>
		<description>[...] on 04 26th, 2009 &#124; no responses    The Wall Street Journal on blogger wages, numbers, and rights.   Mark Penn on why the above WSJ article is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on 04 26th, 2009 | no responses    The Wall Street Journal on blogger wages, numbers, and rights.   Mark Penn on why the above WSJ article is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week&#8217;s Links &#124; Business Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10081</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week&#8217;s Links &#124; Business Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10081</guid>
		<description>[...] Mark Penn on why the above WSJ article is wrong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mark Penn on why the above WSJ article is wrong. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Click World News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Is Ironic: Reporter Cites Bogus WSJ Stats To Claim Bloggers Are Untrustworthy</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10080</link>
		<dc:creator>Click World News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Is Ironic: Reporter Cites Bogus WSJ Stats To Claim Bloggers Are Untrustworthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10080</guid>
		<description>[...] However, plenty of others went through the numbers and pointed out how ridiculous they were. Scott Rosenberg and ReadWriteWeb are two examples of bloggers doing a great job digging into the numbers and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, plenty of others went through the numbers and pointed out how ridiculous they were. Scott Rosenberg and ReadWriteWeb are two examples of bloggers doing a great job digging into the numbers and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Verdict &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Is Ironic: Reporter Cites Bogus WSJ Stats To Claim Bloggers Are Untrustworthy</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Verdict &#187; Blog Archive &#187; This Is Ironic: Reporter Cites Bogus WSJ Stats To Claim Bloggers Are Untrustworthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10079</guid>
		<description>[...] However, plenty of others went through the numbers and pointed out how ridiculous they were. Scott Rosenberg and ReadWriteWeb are two examples of bloggers doing a great job digging into the numbers and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, plenty of others went through the numbers and pointed out how ridiculous they were. Scott Rosenberg and ReadWriteWeb are two examples of bloggers doing a great job digging into the numbers and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Is Ironic: Reporter Cites Bogus WSJ Stats To Claim Bloggers Are Untrustworthy</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10078</link>
		<dc:creator>This Is Ironic: Reporter Cites Bogus WSJ Stats To Claim Bloggers Are Untrustworthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10078</guid>
		<description>[...] However, plenty of others went through the numbers and pointed out how ridiculous they were. Scott Rosenberg and ReadWriteWeb are two examples of bloggers doing a great job digging into the numbers and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] However, plenty of others went through the numbers and pointed out how ridiculous they were. Scott Rosenberg and ReadWriteWeb are two examples of bloggers doing a great job digging into the numbers and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The world according to Blog &#171; Dairy of a Madman</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10074</link>
		<dc:creator>The world according to Blog &#171; Dairy of a Madman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10074</guid>
		<description>[...] article - if deeply flawed - in Tuesday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal about blogging. The numbers are dubious at best, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article &#8211; if deeply flawed &#8211; in Tuesday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal about blogging. The numbers are dubious at best, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#34; Blog Archive &#34; Mark Penn&#8217;s fuzzy pro-blogging stats &#124; ServerFlux</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10067</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#34; Blog Archive &#34; Mark Penn&#8217;s fuzzy pro-blogging stats &#124; ServerFlux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 05:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10067</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the original post:  Scott Rosenberg&#039;s Wordyard &quot; Blog Archive &quot; Mark Penn&#039;s fuzzy pro-blogging stats [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the original post:  Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &quot; Blog Archive &quot; Mark Penn&#8217;s fuzzy pro-blogging stats [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Penn Still Full Of Crap &#171; Oliver Willis</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10058</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Penn Still Full Of Crap &#171; Oliver Willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10058</guid>
		<description>[...] his work on the Clinton campaign was just the end point in a career packed tight with excrement. But he sure has made a lot of money at it (which speaks volumes about corporate and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his work on the Clinton campaign was just the end point in a career packed tight with excrement. But he sure has made a lot of money at it (which speaks volumes about corporate and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Veel betaalde bloggers in de VS&#8217; &#171; De nieuwe reporter</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/21/mark-penns-fuzzy-pro-blogging-stats/comment-page-1/#comment-10046</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Veel betaalde bloggers in de VS&#8217; &#171; De nieuwe reporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1943#comment-10046</guid>
		<description>[...] te verdienen. Indrukwekkende cijfers, maar kloppen ze ook? Scott Rosenberg twijfelt daaraan, zo schrijft hij op zijn blog Wordyard.com. Hij bestudeerde de bronnen van Penn en komt tot de conclusie dat we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] te verdienen. Indrukwekkende cijfers, maar kloppen ze ook? Scott Rosenberg twijfelt daaraan, zo schrijft hij op zijn blog Wordyard.com. Hij bestudeerde de bronnen van Penn en komt tot de conclusie dat we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
