<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Google pay a tax to media corporations?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why &#8220;junk traffic&#8221; isn&#8217;t so junky</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-12890</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Why &#8220;junk traffic&#8221; isn&#8217;t so junky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-12890</guid>
		<description>[...] more important, Chittum completely ignores the way &#8220;junk traffic&#8221; visitors provide &#8220;qualified leads&#8221; to a Web site: they expose your site to new eyes and give you a shot, admittedly fleeting, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more important, Chittum completely ignores the way &#8220;junk traffic&#8221; visitors provide &#8220;qualified leads&#8221; to a Web site: they expose your site to new eyes and give you a shot, admittedly fleeting, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Даниил Семин</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10630</link>
		<dc:creator>Даниил Семин</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10630</guid>
		<description>В очередной раз большое спасибо, хорошие что есть такие люди как вы, которые дают  дельные советы:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>В очередной раз большое спасибо, хорошие что есть такие люди как вы, которые дают  дельные советы:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10424</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 10:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10424</guid>
		<description>What would happen if Google decided to only use AP stories on news.google.com? That way Google isn&#039;t using anything that they don&#039;t have a license to use. Then, not only would the world forget that other newspapers exist, but they&#039;d get the same experience across all the news stories that are a part of the AP. If they think things are bad now, they should see what happens to traffic when the linking stops. Of course the new enemy would be the AP, who uses the stories that it&#039;s given by it&#039;s member papers and profits from it with Google. Newspapers are flailing their swords around as much as they can before falling on them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What would happen if Google decided to only use AP stories on news.google.com? That way Google isn&#8217;t using anything that they don&#8217;t have a license to use. Then, not only would the world forget that other newspapers exist, but they&#8217;d get the same experience across all the news stories that are a part of the AP. If they think things are bad now, they should see what happens to traffic when the linking stops. Of course the new enemy would be the AP, who uses the stories that it&#8217;s given by it&#8217;s member papers and profits from it with Google. Newspapers are flailing their swords around as much as they can before falling on them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not by Links Alone &#171; Networked News</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10364</link>
		<dc:creator>Not by Links Alone &#171; Networked News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 18:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10364</guid>
		<description>[...] it all comes down to a battle between whether Google encourages “hit-and-run” visits or “qualified leads.” I don&#8217;t doubt that searchers from Google often stick around after they alight on a page. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it all comes down to a battle between whether Google encourages “hit-and-run” visits or “qualified leads.” I don&#8217;t doubt that searchers from Google often stick around after they alight on a page. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Slow Checkmate Of Internet Control - News: Everything-e</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10073</link>
		<dc:creator>The Slow Checkmate Of Internet Control - News: Everything-e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10073</guid>
		<description>[...] seen sudden sheepishness from the company in its dealings with the AP, the AAP, and other copyright muscle-flexers. Though it may be too big a fight for even Google, it seems the company is going to have to start [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] seen sudden sheepishness from the company in its dealings with the AP, the AAP, and other copyright muscle-flexers. Though it may be too big a fight for even Google, it seems the company is going to have to start [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10056</link>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10056</guid>
		<description>Your old boss, for being an expert in the journalism space, seems to be lacking some simple facts about the economics of the business.

The mentions that publications must have advertising and circulation revenue. Then he also indicates that the circulation revenue should be 15-20 a month.

I kind of had the idea that since there isn&#039;t any &quot;Circulation&quot; costs in online publishing, there would be less of a need for revenue in that area.

I could get my major metro daily delivered to my house for less than $5.00 per week. Now that they don&#039;t need a printing press, a forest of trees, an endless amount of vehicles to move dead trees and a bunch of underpaid youths it would seem that they should be able to circulate to me for substancially less.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your old boss, for being an expert in the journalism space, seems to be lacking some simple facts about the economics of the business.</p>
<p>The mentions that publications must have advertising and circulation revenue. Then he also indicates that the circulation revenue should be 15-20 a month.</p>
<p>I kind of had the idea that since there isn&#8217;t any &#8220;Circulation&#8221; costs in online publishing, there would be less of a need for revenue in that area.</p>
<p>I could get my major metro daily delivered to my house for less than $5.00 per week. Now that they don&#8217;t need a printing press, a forest of trees, an endless amount of vehicles to move dead trees and a bunch of underpaid youths it would seem that they should be able to circulate to me for substancially less.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nowinki &#187; Why Don&#8217;t Newspapers Realize That Google&#8217;s Handing Them Quality Leads</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10053</link>
		<dc:creator>Nowinki &#187; Why Don&#8217;t Newspapers Realize That Google&#8217;s Handing Them Quality Leads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10053</guid>
		<description>[...] newspapers. The whole thing is worth reading, but there&#039;s one key message towards the beginning: Google is providing newspapers with &quot;qualified leads,&quot; normally considered the most valuable type of leads in any sales operation. These are people who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] newspapers. The whole thing is worth reading, but there&#8217;s one key message towards the beginning: Google is providing newspapers with &#8220;qualified leads,&#8221; normally considered the most valuable type of leads in any sales operation. These are people who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Don&#8217;t Newspapers Realize That Google&#8217;s Handing Them Quality Leads &#124; Tech News Direct</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10052</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Don&#8217;t Newspapers Realize That Google&#8217;s Handing Them Quality Leads &#124; Tech News Direct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10052</guid>
		<description>[...] newspapers. The whole thing is worth reading, but there&#039;s one key message towards the beginning: Google is providing newspapers with &quot;qualified leads,&quot; normally considered the most valuable type of leads in any sales operation. These are people who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] newspapers. The whole thing is worth reading, but there&#8217;s one key message towards the beginning: Google is providing newspapers with &#8220;qualified leads,&#8221; normally considered the most valuable type of leads in any sales operation. These are people who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Don&#8217;t Newspapers Realize That Google&#8217;s Handing Them Quality Leads &#124; bitbucket.kylewelsh.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10051</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Don&#8217;t Newspapers Realize That Google&#8217;s Handing Them Quality Leads &#124; bitbucket.kylewelsh.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10051</guid>
		<description>[...] newspapers. The whole thing is worth reading, but there&#039;s one key message towards the beginning: Google is providing newspapers with &quot;qualified leads,&quot; normally considered the most valuable type of leads in any sales operation. These are people who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] newspapers. The whole thing is worth reading, but there&#8217;s one key message towards the beginning: Google is providing newspapers with &#8220;qualified leads,&#8221; normally considered the most valuable type of leads in any sales operation. These are people who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Don&#8217;t Newspapers Realize That Google&#8217;s Handing Them Quality Leads</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2009/04/20/should-google-pay-a-tax-to-media-corporations/comment-page-1/#comment-10050</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Don&#8217;t Newspapers Realize That Google&#8217;s Handing Them Quality Leads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1935#comment-10050</guid>
		<description>[...] newspapers. The whole thing is worth reading, but there&#039;s one key message towards the beginning: Google is providing newspapers with &quot;qualified leads,&quot; normally considered the most valuable type of leads in any sales operation. These are people who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] newspapers. The whole thing is worth reading, but there&#8217;s one key message towards the beginning: Google is providing newspapers with &#8220;qualified leads,&#8221; normally considered the most valuable type of leads in any sales operation. These are people who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
