http://www.wordyard.com/2008/11/11/knight-challenge-link/ Technology, politics, culture Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:30:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.wordyard.com/2008/11/11/knight-challenge-link/comment-page-1/#comment-10697 Scott Rosenberg’s Wordyard » Blog Archive » MediaBugs: a Knight News Challenge winner Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:24:39 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1621#comment-10697 [...] an idea I’ve been talking about for a long time. (I posted briefly about my application last fall.) I’m grateful to the Knight Foundation for giving us a chance [...] [...] an idea I’ve been talking about for a long time. (I posted briefly about my application last fall.) I’m grateful to the Knight Foundation for giving us a chance [...]

]]> http://www.wordyard.com/2008/11/11/knight-challenge-link/comment-page-1/#comment-10377 Scott Rosenberg’s Wordyard » Blog Archive » Dowd’s changed story Sun, 24 May 2009 14:17:09 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1621#comment-10377 [...] share Dave’s view about viewing these problems as bugs to fix (that’s the essence of the project I entered in the Knight News Challenge). But I think “stonewalling” isn’t the right word for the paper’s response; [...] [...] share Dave’s view about viewing these problems as bugs to fix (that’s the essence of the project I entered in the Knight News Challenge). But I think “stonewalling” isn’t the right word for the paper’s response; [...]

]]> http://www.wordyard.com/2008/11/11/knight-challenge-link/comment-page-1/#comment-9435 Scott Rosenberg Mon, 23 Feb 2009 06:11:53 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1621#comment-9435 You know, I know that, alas. The Knight people made a point of saying, "All entries will be public," which I thought was pretty cool, and meant that I could link to my application. But then after I guess the first round closed, they seem to have taken all those applications offline again. So there's no way to fix the link right now. Sorry. If the project gets funded I'll be posting much more about it, for sure. You know, I know that, alas. The Knight people made a point of saying, “All entries will be public,” which I thought was pretty cool, and meant that I could link to my application. But then after I guess the first round closed, they seem to have taken all those applications offline again. So there’s no way to fix the link right now. Sorry. If the project gets funded I’ll be posting much more about it, for sure.

]]> http://www.wordyard.com/2008/11/11/knight-challenge-link/comment-page-1/#comment-9434 Joe Murphy Mon, 23 Feb 2009 04:43:19 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1621#comment-9434 Hey Scott -- your link to MediaBugs on the Knight site brings up Knight's version of a 404: http://generalapp.newschallenge.org/SNC/ViewItem.aspx?pguid=4a4f8c6a-d2c2-4545-82db-c8ed4b415eba&itemguid=15a41edf-c7f7-48c4-8375-5cd6cf9b30ac Hey Scott — your link to MediaBugs on the Knight site brings up Knight’s version of a 404: http://generalapp.newschallenge.org/SNC/ViewItem.aspx?pguid=4a4f8c6a-d2c2-4545-82db-c8ed4b415eba&itemguid=15a41edf-c7f7-48c4-8375-5cd6cf9b30ac

]]> http://www.wordyard.com/2008/11/11/knight-challenge-link/comment-page-1/#comment-9400 Scott Rosenberg’s Wordyard » Blog Archive » Where’s Scott? Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:32:38 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1621#comment-9400 [...] already posted a bit about my entry in the Knight News Challenge competition — MediaBugs, a public “bug tracker” for errors and other problems with media [...] [...] already posted a bit about my entry in the Knight News Challenge competition — MediaBugs, a public “bug tracker” for errors and other problems with media [...]

]]> http://www.wordyard.com/2008/11/11/knight-challenge-link/comment-page-1/#comment-4905 Andrew Brown Wed, 12 Nov 2008 14:11:22 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1621#comment-4905 I find 1,000 a day is perfectly reasonable when writing books. Journalism is entirely different, and can be much more or less, but it's never written in the same state of concentration. I find 1,000 a day is perfectly reasonable when writing books. Journalism is entirely different, and can be much more or less, but it’s never written in the same state of concentration.

]]>