<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain blames &#8220;greed&#8221; for Wall St. woes. Huh?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2008/09/16/mccain-blames-greed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/09/16/mccain-blames-greed/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Louis James</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/09/16/mccain-blames-greed/comment-page-1/#comment-4566</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1605#comment-4566</guid>
		<description>Very good point about &quot;greed&quot; and &quot;corruption&quot; on Wall Street.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good point about &#8220;greed&#8221; and &#8220;corruption&#8221; on Wall Street.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/09/16/mccain-blames-greed/comment-page-1/#comment-4509</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1605#comment-4509</guid>
		<description>Scott,

Not saying this is exactly what McCain believes, but I think this perspective can shed some more light on the issue:

http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=2550

Best, 
Nathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>Not saying this is exactly what McCain believes, but I think this perspective can shed some more light on the issue:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=2550" rel="nofollow">http://www.albertmohler.com/blog_read.php?id=2550</a></p>
<p>Best,<br />
Nathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/09/16/mccain-blames-greed/comment-page-1/#comment-4477</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 04:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1605#comment-4477</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s strange indeed... Republicans are squarely responsible for getting us into this mess.  I&#039;m currently reading Thomas Frank&#039;s new book, which is a masterful expose of the fruits of deregulation and other conservative ideologies.  Blaming this on greedy individuals (yet another &quot;few bad apples&quot;) is just more spin or denial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s strange indeed&#8230; Republicans are squarely responsible for getting us into this mess.  I&#8217;m currently reading Thomas Frank&#8217;s new book, which is a masterful expose of the fruits of deregulation and other conservative ideologies.  Blaming this on greedy individuals (yet another &#8220;few bad apples&#8221;) is just more spin or denial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/09/16/mccain-blames-greed/comment-page-1/#comment-4476</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1605#comment-4476</guid>
		<description>&quot;far too insecure&quot; is rather mush-mouthed.

just call it &quot;hypocrisy&quot; and be done with it...

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;far too insecure&#8221; is rather mush-mouthed.</p>
<p>just call it &#8220;hypocrisy&#8221; and be done with it&#8230;</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/09/16/mccain-blames-greed/comment-page-1/#comment-4475</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1605#comment-4475</guid>
		<description>Hmmm... is there necessarily hypocrisy here?

SR: &quot;Because most of us expect Wall Street bankers to be greedy. Comes with the territory. And when we put money in one of their investment accounts, we usually expect them to get us the best return, too.

The problem is, we expect that investment to take place in an environment where there’s a reasonable guarantee of good information and fair dealing....

One party has always stood for kicking away safeguards and regulations in the name of the free market driven by — what? — oh, right, greed.&quot;

Greed is selfishness.  But is &quot;self-interest&quot; necessarily selfishness, necessarily greed.  Hardly.  It is possible that McCain is being a hypocrite, but a person may agree with what he says about greed (&quot;What’s evident in the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the other continuing shockwaves from the subprime mortgage mess is that, for a long time, the system suffered from a shortage of information and transparency and an excess of risky, blind betting&quot; - oh, and greed), believe that being a Republican is important, and invest *responsibly* (which also *helps* those companies) - with an eye towards how companies treat their employees and the communities in which they are situated - in order to take care of their familiy (&quot;self-interest&quot; = trying to make enough to live frugally, not excessively, and to leave an inheritance for one&#039;s children, as a resonsible parent should), whom they love, so that they in turn, can be of service to their neighbors, helping them to do likewise.  Good, independent, strong families *who also care about their neighbors* are one of the essential ingredients - nay, the main ingredient - of what makes a democratic form of government even possible (expect to hear more of this kind of formulation - in parables and such, from Republican-populist guys like Mike Huckabee in the future).  

If you don&#039;t think an individual person can do all this, but must necessarily be greedy in a greedy system, I pity you.  And you&#039;re being hypocritical (which I say in a nice way, because I think hypocrite is just another word for human being).  

The &quot;system&quot; is made up of individuals, and at this point, I think that it is at least possible for a person can be a non-greedy individual while using the system.  

SR: &quot;And when we put money in one of their investment accounts, we usually expect them to get us the best return, too.&quot;

Well than don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; is there necessarily hypocrisy here?</p>
<p>SR: &#8220;Because most of us expect Wall Street bankers to be greedy. Comes with the territory. And when we put money in one of their investment accounts, we usually expect them to get us the best return, too.</p>
<p>The problem is, we expect that investment to take place in an environment where there’s a reasonable guarantee of good information and fair dealing&#8230;.</p>
<p>One party has always stood for kicking away safeguards and regulations in the name of the free market driven by — what? — oh, right, greed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Greed is selfishness.  But is &#8220;self-interest&#8221; necessarily selfishness, necessarily greed.  Hardly.  It is possible that McCain is being a hypocrite, but a person may agree with what he says about greed (&#8220;What’s evident in the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the other continuing shockwaves from the subprime mortgage mess is that, for a long time, the system suffered from a shortage of information and transparency and an excess of risky, blind betting&#8221; &#8211; oh, and greed), believe that being a Republican is important, and invest *responsibly* (which also *helps* those companies) &#8211; with an eye towards how companies treat their employees and the communities in which they are situated &#8211; in order to take care of their familiy (&#8220;self-interest&#8221; = trying to make enough to live frugally, not excessively, and to leave an inheritance for one&#8217;s children, as a resonsible parent should), whom they love, so that they in turn, can be of service to their neighbors, helping them to do likewise.  Good, independent, strong families *who also care about their neighbors* are one of the essential ingredients &#8211; nay, the main ingredient &#8211; of what makes a democratic form of government even possible (expect to hear more of this kind of formulation &#8211; in parables and such, from Republican-populist guys like Mike Huckabee in the future).  </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t think an individual person can do all this, but must necessarily be greedy in a greedy system, I pity you.  And you&#8217;re being hypocritical (which I say in a nice way, because I think hypocrite is just another word for human being).  </p>
<p>The &#8220;system&#8221; is made up of individuals, and at this point, I think that it is at least possible for a person can be a non-greedy individual while using the system.  </p>
<p>SR: &#8220;And when we put money in one of their investment accounts, we usually expect them to get us the best return, too.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well than don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best Webfoot Forward &#187; Greed &#8212; good or bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/09/16/mccain-blames-greed/comment-page-1/#comment-4469</link>
		<dc:creator>Best Webfoot Forward &#187; Greed &#8212; good or bad?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 23:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1605#comment-4469</guid>
		<description>[...] Rosenberg today clearly points out the hypocrisy of a Republican saying that the problem with the financial markets&#8217; meltdown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rosenberg today clearly points out the hypocrisy of a Republican saying that the problem with the financial markets&#8217; meltdown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
