Comments on: Chandler 1.0 ships

By: Louis Kessler

Louis Kessler — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:50:38 +0000

The question was asked on Stackoverflow: “How can I apply David Allen’s Getting Things Done as a programmer.”

My answer pointed to Chandler, with references to your book that I just started reading a month ago, before I discovered Chandler now actually exists!

See my answer at: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/248159/how-can-i-apply-david-allens-getting-things-done-as-a-programmer#249199

By: PeacefullyQuaintTeen

PeacefullyQuaintTeen — Mon, 18 Aug 2008 07:24:41 +0000

…to the deafening sound of silence….

By: Bob Erb

Bob Erb — Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:07:55 +0000

Funny that Chandler 1.0 — something I’ve waited for for so long — snuffs the final breath out of my hopes of what it might be, when it arrives. This was supposed to be Agenda++ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lotus_Agenda). It’s sad. I’m nostalgic, again, for my HP 200LX, with it’s excellent clicky keyboard, it’s tiny monochrome screen, slowly running Agenda.

Thanks to Mitch for trying.

By: john

john — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:50:01 +0000

When I saw the announcement that Chandler 1.0 had been released, I almost fell out of my chair—mostly because, after reading your excellent book, I came to believe that OSAF’s dog food would never reach supermarket shelves. That it finally did is a testament to all of the developers you profiled so insightfully.

Good luck with the new project!

By: Steven Romej

Steven Romej — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:08:57 +0000

I just finished your book last week and thought it was interesting to start seeing references to Chandler in the news. Thanks for your work chronicling the development process.