<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eclectica / Links for July 7th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2008/07/06/eclectica-links-for-july-7th/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/07/06/eclectica-links-for-july-7th/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/07/06/eclectica-links-for-july-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-3693</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 06:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1578#comment-3693</guid>
		<description>(1) My description was  factual and the link text expressed no particular endorsement for her post.

(2) She didn&#039;t say anything about whining in this post -- that, apparently, was in another post.  In fact, though, I too believe that veteran journalists should stop whining and start figuring out what&#039;s next. Newspapers have been in a slow downspin for as long as I&#039;ve been a professional journalist, which is getting close to 30 years now.  I worked in a daily newsroom for over a decade and left for the Web 13 years ago because I could see what was coming. I&#039;m sorry it&#039;s taken so many people so long to see the slow train barreling down the tracks at them, but now it&#039;s here.

(3) I have no idea whether the editor&#039;s plan is any good or not. I linked to the post mostly because I found the discussion interesting. 

If you know that the editor&#039;s plan is doomed, why don&#039;t you tell us what you think a dying newspaper should do? And please don&#039;t just say &quot;they should do their jobs, cover their beats better and break more stories.&quot; Because this is an economic problem, not a journalistic one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(1) My description was  factual and the link text expressed no particular endorsement for her post.</p>
<p>(2) She didn&#8217;t say anything about whining in this post &#8212; that, apparently, was in another post.  In fact, though, I too believe that veteran journalists should stop whining and start figuring out what&#8217;s next. Newspapers have been in a slow downspin for as long as I&#8217;ve been a professional journalist, which is getting close to 30 years now.  I worked in a daily newsroom for over a decade and left for the Web 13 years ago because I could see what was coming. I&#8217;m sorry it&#8217;s taken so many people so long to see the slow train barreling down the tracks at them, but now it&#8217;s here.</p>
<p>(3) I have no idea whether the editor&#8217;s plan is any good or not. I linked to the post mostly because I found the discussion interesting. </p>
<p>If you know that the editor&#8217;s plan is doomed, why don&#8217;t you tell us what you think a dying newspaper should do? And please don&#8217;t just say &#8220;they should do their jobs, cover their beats better and break more stories.&#8221; Because this is an economic problem, not a journalistic one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wenalway</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/07/06/eclectica-links-for-july-7th/comment-page-1/#comment-3691</link>
		<dc:creator>Wenalway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 05:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1578#comment-3691</guid>
		<description>&quot;On her blog, a Tampa newspaper intern praises her editor’s speech about newsroom change in the wake of layoffs, sparking a huge debate among veteran ink-stained wretches.&quot;

1. The main line from her speech apparently was regurgitated from another manager.

2. The intern said veteran journalists should &quot;stop whining.&quot;

3. The editor&#039;s plan is the same destined-to-fail roll of the dice other newsrooms have attempted. It&#039;s not new. It&#039;s not innovative.

People who write books should know how to get facts. Perhaps you should write fiction, as you&#039;ve done here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;On her blog, a Tampa newspaper intern praises her editor’s speech about newsroom change in the wake of layoffs, sparking a huge debate among veteran ink-stained wretches.&#8221;</p>
<p>1. The main line from her speech apparently was regurgitated from another manager.</p>
<p>2. The intern said veteran journalists should &#8220;stop whining.&#8221;</p>
<p>3. The editor&#8217;s plan is the same destined-to-fail roll of the dice other newsrooms have attempted. It&#8217;s not new. It&#8217;s not innovative.</p>
<p>People who write books should know how to get facts. Perhaps you should write fiction, as you&#8217;ve done here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
