<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AP responds on blog excerpting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 12:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3323</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3323</guid>
		<description>I guess the first question that comes to mind is, shouldn't they be going after Digg? Their stated objection seems to apply to Digg.

"We get concerned, however, when we feel the use is more reproduction than reference, or when others are encouraged to cut and paste".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess the first question that comes to mind is, shouldn&#8217;t they be going after Digg? Their stated objection seems to apply to Digg.</p>
<p>&#8220;We get concerned, however, when we feel the use is more reproduction than reference, or when others are encouraged to cut and paste&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup: The Associated Press takes on blog excerpts, Google&#8217;s escape clause revealed and more &#187; VentureBeat</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3305</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup: The Associated Press takes on blog excerpts, Google&#8217;s escape clause revealed and more &#187; VentureBeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3305</guid>
		<description>[...] blogging practice. AP Strategy Director Jim Kennedy&#8217;s response that the excerpts were &#8220;more reproduction than reference&#8221; did little to clear things up. Kennedy later told the New York Times that the AP&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogging practice. AP Strategy Director Jim Kennedy&#8217;s response that the excerpts were &#8220;more reproduction than reference&#8221; did little to clear things up. Kennedy later told the New York Times that the AP&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hell Hath NO Fury Like Bloggers Bullied: Associated Press Boycott &#124; Reno and Its Discontents</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3296</link>
		<dc:creator>Hell Hath NO Fury Like Bloggers Bullied: Associated Press Boycott &#124; Reno and Its Discontents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 01:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3296</guid>
		<description>[...] Retort Newshoggers Culture Kitchen Buzz Machine WordYard Reno and Its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Retort Newshoggers Culture Kitchen Buzz Machine WordYard Reno and Its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan herrell - the head lemur</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3294</link>
		<dc:creator>alan herrell - the head lemur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 22:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3294</guid>
		<description>Brief Excerpts 'are' Fair Use. Says So at the Copyright Office. As you mentioned, the only quibble is the percentage of the excerpt.  

The 'misappropriation of  'hot news'' crap contained in the posting on Rodgers site, is a novel legal theory that was used in a case between two competing news services in 1918, which was more properly a plagiarism and theft case than an infringement or Fair Use Violation.

It looks like the AP wants to be the New RIAA. Probably because the same thing is happening to them that is happening to the record industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brief Excerpts &#8216;are&#8217; Fair Use. Says So at the Copyright Office. As you mentioned, the only quibble is the percentage of the excerpt.  </p>
<p>The &#8216;misappropriation of  &#8216;hot news&#8221; crap contained in the posting on Rodgers site, is a novel legal theory that was used in a case between two competing news services in 1918, which was more properly a plagiarism and theft case than an infringement or Fair Use Violation.</p>
<p>It looks like the AP wants to be the New RIAA. Probably because the same thing is happening to them that is happening to the record industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SisterofDot</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3291</link>
		<dc:creator>SisterofDot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/13/ap-responds-on-blog-excerpting/#comment-3291</guid>
		<description>http://techdirt.com/articles/20080613/0117561394.shtml

Here he goes again.  Jeff that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techdirt.com/articles/20080613/0117561394.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://techdirt.com/articles/20080613/0117561394.shtml</a></p>
<p>Here he goes again.  Jeff that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
