<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nick Carr&#8217;s new knock on the Web: does it change how we read?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 18:06:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/comment-page-1/#comment-3450</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/#comment-3450</guid>
		<description>There are some interesting things to think about here, but I find these concerns to be fairly exaggerated, especially the concerns about &quot;Intellectual Taylorism.&quot;

One of the best ripostes to that line of argument is your own book, Dreaming in Code, which I&#039;ve finally been able to move from my Should Read list to my Have Read list.  Like all software, the Internet is highly malleable and therefore how we interact with it is also highly malleable.  You can, if you choose, flit from four-line blog post to four-line blog post, but you can also choose to spend hours reading the long form text that is available online.

I think the most limiting factor in most peoples&#039; book reading is just time.  With work and driving to work, most people have around ten to eleven hours of attention each day spoken for.  Add in commitments such as avoiding divorce and not letting the children starve, then many people have just enough time left to eke out a few hours of sleep.

In my particular case, I&#039;m fortunate to have a source of reading time in the form of my BART ride from Glen Park to Oakland and back everyday.  With waiting time factored in, this can be as much as two hours that I can spend reading.  With a library conveniently located next to the station, I&#039;ve been able to get my average to a book every week to week and a half.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some interesting things to think about here, but I find these concerns to be fairly exaggerated, especially the concerns about &#8220;Intellectual Taylorism.&#8221;</p>
<p>One of the best ripostes to that line of argument is your own book, Dreaming in Code, which I&#8217;ve finally been able to move from my Should Read list to my Have Read list.  Like all software, the Internet is highly malleable and therefore how we interact with it is also highly malleable.  You can, if you choose, flit from four-line blog post to four-line blog post, but you can also choose to spend hours reading the long form text that is available online.</p>
<p>I think the most limiting factor in most peoples&#8217; book reading is just time.  With work and driving to work, most people have around ten to eleven hours of attention each day spoken for.  Add in commitments such as avoiding divorce and not letting the children starve, then many people have just enough time left to eke out a few hours of sleep.</p>
<p>In my particular case, I&#8217;m fortunate to have a source of reading time in the form of my BART ride from Glen Park to Oakland and back everyday.  With waiting time factored in, this can be as much as two hours that I can spend reading.  With a library conveniently located next to the station, I&#8217;ve been able to get my average to a book every week to week and a half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Reed</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/comment-page-1/#comment-3367</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 21:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/#comment-3367</guid>
		<description>Good critique - I totally agree about the way we may be totally used to flittting around the web at google-speed but can also get into quality writing the same way we always used to. (I&#039;ve just finished Here Comes Everybody too).

I&#039;ve just blogged on Carr&#039;s article too - in particular how people adapt to new technology pretty quickly. Whoever does long division on paper since calculators were invented...

I&#039;m nothing to do with it, but judging by your blogroll - you might want to check out old copies in particular of The Idler Magazine - which was big in the UK for a while.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good critique &#8211; I totally agree about the way we may be totally used to flittting around the web at google-speed but can also get into quality writing the same way we always used to. (I&#8217;ve just finished Here Comes Everybody too).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just blogged on Carr&#8217;s article too &#8211; in particular how people adapt to new technology pretty quickly. Whoever does long division on paper since calculators were invented&#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m nothing to do with it, but judging by your blogroll &#8211; you might want to check out old copies in particular of The Idler Magazine &#8211; which was big in the UK for a while.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Please pay attention, please?</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/comment-page-1/#comment-3281</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Please pay attention, please?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 03:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/#comment-3281</guid>
		<description>[...] a few other links carrying on from yesterday&#8217;s post about Nick Carr&#8217;s lament that Google and the web in general have made it harder for us to pay attention to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a few other links carrying on from yesterday&#8217;s post about Nick Carr&#8217;s lament that Google and the web in general have made it harder for us to pay attention to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Rae</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/comment-page-1/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 16:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>The internet improves my reading.  I often look up words, peoples, and places that I read about in books.  

Also, the Internet is the best way anywhere to *find* good books to read.  Example: currently reading &quot;The Worst Hard Time&quot; by Timothy Egan, found on Audible.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The internet improves my reading.  I often look up words, peoples, and places that I read about in books.  </p>
<p>Also, the Internet is the best way anywhere to *find* good books to read.  Example: currently reading &#8220;The Worst Hard Time&#8221; by Timothy Egan, found on Audible.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Wednesday squibs</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/comment-page-1/#comment-3275</link>
		<dc:creator>Notes from a Teacher: Mark on Media &#187; Wednesday squibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 20:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/2008/06/11/nick-carrs-new-knock-on-the-web-does-it-change-how-we-read/#comment-3275</guid>
		<description>[...] in the internet age and What It All Might Mean. (Some pushback: Mathew Ingram, Blaise Alleyne, Scott Rosenberg; one who agrees with at least part of the argument, is Jon Udell.) I don&#8217;t find Carr&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in the internet age and What It All Might Mean. (Some pushback: Mathew Ingram, Blaise Alleyne, Scott Rosenberg; one who agrees with at least part of the argument, is Jon Udell.) I don&#8217;t find Carr&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
