<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Moore&#8217;s Law, once more with feeling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/24/moores-law-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/24/moores-law-2/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/24/moores-law-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1043</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1392#comment-1043</guid>
		<description>I agree. But in lieu of that there is, and has been for a long time,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/bios/moore.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;official bio&quot; info&lt;/a&gt; on the Intel site that confirms the &quot;First I said double every year, then I said double every 2 years&quot; version, so I think it&#039;s as close to authoritative as we&#039;re gonna get. Presumably as the company founder he had some direct involvement in reviewing the information on the Intel site! It&#039;s also the first hit on google for &quot;Gordon Moore Moore&#039;s Law&quot; so it&#039;s pretty accessible. Which makes it remarkable how often the 18-month misinfo still gets recirculated...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. But in lieu of that there is, and has been for a long time,<a href="http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/bios/moore.htm" rel="nofollow">&#8220;official bio&#8221; info</a> on the Intel site that confirms the &#8220;First I said double every year, then I said double every 2 years&#8221; version, so I think it&#8217;s as close to authoritative as we&#8217;re gonna get. Presumably as the company founder he had some direct involvement in reviewing the information on the Intel site! It&#8217;s also the first hit on google for &#8220;Gordon Moore Moore&#8217;s Law&#8221; so it&#8217;s pretty accessible. Which makes it remarkable how often the 18-month misinfo still gets recirculated&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeff jarvis</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/24/moores-law-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1044</link>
		<dc:creator>jeff jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1392#comment-1044</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d help if Moore had a blog post ranting about this and we all linked to THAT. then we&#039;d have no doubt that he is the definitive source and we&#039;d all find it. maybe that&#039;s a reason for authorship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d help if Moore had a blog post ranting about this and we all linked to THAT. then we&#8217;d have no doubt that he is the definitive source and we&#8217;d all find it. maybe that&#8217;s a reason for authorship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
