<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chandler Preview: from dream toward reality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/20/chandler-preview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/20/chandler-preview/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A year of Dreaming in Code</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/20/chandler-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1568</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A year of Dreaming in Code</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 07:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1388#comment-1568</guid>
		<description>[...] will be out the third week in February, with a new afterword that carries the story through the release of Chandler&#8217;s Preview edition. The recent restructuring and cutbacks of the project are foreshadowed in this section. But they [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will be out the third week in February, with a new afterword that carries the story through the release of Chandler&#8217;s Preview edition. The recent restructuring and cutbacks of the project are foreshadowed in this section. But they [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/20/chandler-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1388#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>Hi, Philippe! For my everyday calendaring right now, I&#039;ve only recently gotten my family onto Google in such a way that all our calendars dovetail. It&#039;s too soon for me to impose a general platform shift on my domicile. Maybe by Chandler 1.0, or before. In the meantime I&#039;ll keep playing with Chandler, too, no question.

Right now, as I tried to say, I think Chandler falls maybe a little uncormfortably between two stools: it&#039;s not quite all there as a calendar (in ways that I think your team already knows -- printing and month view and so on); it&#039;s also plainly much *more* than a calendar, with the dashboard and task management and stamping and so on -- but these aspects of the program feel (at least to me) considerably less ready for intensive use.

My own informational needs encompass two big areas: personal GTD-style task-flow management, and the organization of huge quantities of research (textual material).

I can well imagine Chandler eventually serving me in the GTD/task management area, and serving well. But right now I&#039;m still finding Ecco Pro best for both of these. That&#039;s no doubt in part because I&#039;ve been using it for so long. It also launches super-fast, responds very quickly (it&#039;s a mid-90s application, after all) and is  bulletproof (really, it never ever crashes). All these are important to me.

I haven&#039;t chimed in on the mailing list because it strikes me that the things I need are probably already on your todo list. (And I realize that saying &quot;make Chandler so it&#039;s really fast and never crashes&quot; isn&#039;t terribly helpful!) But I&#039;m happy to weigh in if it might help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Philippe! For my everyday calendaring right now, I&#8217;ve only recently gotten my family onto Google in such a way that all our calendars dovetail. It&#8217;s too soon for me to impose a general platform shift on my domicile. Maybe by Chandler 1.0, or before. In the meantime I&#8217;ll keep playing with Chandler, too, no question.</p>
<p>Right now, as I tried to say, I think Chandler falls maybe a little uncormfortably between two stools: it&#8217;s not quite all there as a calendar (in ways that I think your team already knows &#8212; printing and month view and so on); it&#8217;s also plainly much *more* than a calendar, with the dashboard and task management and stamping and so on &#8212; but these aspects of the program feel (at least to me) considerably less ready for intensive use.</p>
<p>My own informational needs encompass two big areas: personal GTD-style task-flow management, and the organization of huge quantities of research (textual material).</p>
<p>I can well imagine Chandler eventually serving me in the GTD/task management area, and serving well. But right now I&#8217;m still finding Ecco Pro best for both of these. That&#8217;s no doubt in part because I&#8217;ve been using it for so long. It also launches super-fast, responds very quickly (it&#8217;s a mid-90s application, after all) and is  bulletproof (really, it never ever crashes). All these are important to me.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t chimed in on the mailing list because it strikes me that the things I need are probably already on your todo list. (And I realize that saying &#8220;make Chandler so it&#8217;s really fast and never crashes&#8221; isn&#8217;t terribly helpful!) But I&#8217;m happy to weigh in if it might help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pbossut</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/20/chandler-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>pbossut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 22:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1388#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>Nice of you to post this Scott. One thing that&#039;s a little frustrating though is hearing that you won&#039;t use Chandler for your everyday use and that you&#039;re not happy with what you use now, but you&#039;re not saying *what is it* that Chandler and that other app are missing that you need. If you&#039;re not saying what you need, there&#039;s little chance we&#039;ll ever meet that need one day. You know what: why don&#039;t you chime in on chandler-users and tell us what you think? You know where to find us don&#039;t you?... :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice of you to post this Scott. One thing that&#8217;s a little frustrating though is hearing that you won&#8217;t use Chandler for your everyday use and that you&#8217;re not happy with what you use now, but you&#8217;re not saying *what is it* that Chandler and that other app are missing that you need. If you&#8217;re not saying what you need, there&#8217;s little chance we&#8217;ll ever meet that need one day. You know what: why don&#8217;t you chime in on chandler-users and tell us what you think? You know where to find us don&#8217;t you?&#8230; :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/20/chandler-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 05:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1388#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>it will be interesting to see if th eworld beats a path to their door just because they have built a beta mousetrap.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it will be interesting to see if th eworld beats a path to their door just because they have built a beta mousetrap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan s.</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/09/20/chandler-preview/comment-page-1/#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>dan s.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 07:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1388#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>Five years... a long time no doubt. But then again, how much has outlook changed in that time? Just saying that there&#039;s still a great need for something to be done in that field.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five years&#8230; a long time no doubt. But then again, how much has outlook changed in that time? Just saying that there&#8217;s still a great need for something to be done in that field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
