<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Guardian piece on blog history</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 12:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pre-holiday clearance - World Class Ebooks</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator>Pre-holiday clearance - World Class Ebooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1377#comment-2490</guid>
		<description>[...] his own blog, in a post dated 29 August, Scott reflects on his Guardian piece and adds some further notes on correcting what appears in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] his own blog, in a post dated 29 August, Scott reflects on his Guardian piece and adds some further notes on correcting what appears in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Chew</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Chew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1377#comment-990</guid>
		<description>Hello Scott. Recently, there was an article in one of Singapore's leading mainstream publication that essentially dismissed blogs. I've &lt;a href="http://ramblinglibrarian.blogspot.com/2007/09/i-have-never-nor-will-i-ever-read-blogs_09.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;referred to your piece&lt;/a&gt;, which served as an excellent counterpoint. Cheers. Ivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Scott. Recently, there was an article in one of Singapore&#8217;s leading mainstream publication that essentially dismissed blogs. I&#8217;ve <a href="http://ramblinglibrarian.blogspot.com/2007/09/i-have-never-nor-will-i-ever-read-blogs_09.html" rel="nofollow">referred to your piece</a>, which served as an excellent counterpoint. Cheers. Ivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blogging Translator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Happy 10th Blogiversary</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Blogging Translator &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Happy 10th Blogiversary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2007 14:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1377#comment-989</guid>
		<description>[...] Rosenburg of wordyard.com writes in The Guardian today (29/08/07) that blogging is now in its second decade. The first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rosenburg of wordyard.com writes in The Guardian today (29/08/07) that blogging is now in its second decade. The first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Stories 2007-08-31</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Stories 2007-08-31</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 20:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1377#comment-988</guid>
		<description>[...] If the Times is capitalizing on its archives, it ought to take more responsibility for the new currency it has granted to old stories (and their errors). Shafer’s [with Slate] attitude is that people who are hurt by these old stories should go out and fix the problem themselves. I’d do that, if I were in their shoes, but I’ve been a journalist all my life. I don’t think the Times can take such a cavalier stance. Because in the end, if the paper tells its subjects that it’s their responsibility to establish an accurate public record, people will start wondering why they need the paper’s version of the record at all. - My Guardian piece on blog history [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If the Times is capitalizing on its archives, it ought to take more responsibility for the new currency it has granted to old stories (and their errors). Shafer’s [with Slate] attitude is that people who are hurt by these old stories should go out and fix the problem themselves. I’d do that, if I were in their shoes, but I’ve been a journalist all my life. I don’t think the Times can take such a cavalier stance. Because in the end, if the paper tells its subjects that it’s their responsibility to establish an accurate public record, people will start wondering why they need the paper’s version of the record at all. - My Guardian piece on blog history [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: colin byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>colin byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1377#comment-985</guid>
		<description>loved the piece, though frankly who cares when the 10th anniversary is. I can barely remember when my own birthday is. The Guardian's commentariat is what has drawn me back as a reader after many years of loathing the paper for it's anti-Blair posturing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loved the piece, though frankly who cares when the 10th anniversary is. I can barely remember when my own birthday is. The Guardian&#8217;s commentariat is what has drawn me back as a reader after many years of loathing the paper for it&#8217;s anti-Blair posturing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Happy 10th Blogiversary &#171; Plainenglish&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>Happy 10th Blogiversary &#171; Plainenglish&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1377#comment-986</guid>
		<description>[...] Rosenburg of wordyard.com writes in The Guardian today (29/08/07) that blogging is now in its second decade. The first [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Rosenburg of wordyard.com writes in The Guardian today (29/08/07) that blogging is now in its second decade. The first [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis James</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/29/guardian-blogs-piece/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 22:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1377#comment-987</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://syndeticfluxion.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/youtube-revolution/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Did anyone predict blogs?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://syndeticfluxion.wordpress.com/2007/08/29/youtube-revolution/" rel="nofollow">Did anyone predict blogs?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
