Comments on: Murdoch, the Journal, and the newsroom diaspora http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/01/newsroom-diaspora/ Technology, politics, culture Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:43:15 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: c139 motorola ringtones tracfone http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/01/newsroom-diaspora/comment-page-1/#comment-2960 c139 motorola ringtones tracfone Sat, 03 May 2008 07:06:32 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1352#comment-2960 <strong>jack black products...</strong> Today bonus gratuites de casino jeu baccarat gratuites... jack black products…

Today bonus gratuites de casino jeu baccarat gratuites…

]]> By: Scott Rosenberg’s Wordyard » Blog Archive » Doc Searls: don’t count on ads http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/01/newsroom-diaspora/comment-page-1/#comment-906 Scott Rosenberg’s Wordyard » Blog Archive » Doc Searls: don’t count on ads Thu, 20 Sep 2007 21:30:05 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1352#comment-906 [...] sell…other stuff that ends up paying the salaries of the journalists. In any case, I’ve long thought that this beloved wall — for all its ethical value, when it worked — had an insidious [...] [...] sell…other stuff that ends up paying the salaries of the journalists. In any case, I’ve long thought that this beloved wall — for all its ethical value, when it worked — had an insidious [...]

]]> By: MediaBlog » Om het nog even samen te vatten http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/01/newsroom-diaspora/comment-page-1/#comment-902 MediaBlog » Om het nog even samen te vatten Sat, 11 Aug 2007 10:56:42 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1352#comment-902 [...] Wall Street Journal is verkocht aan Murdoch. Commentaar van Scott [...] [...] Wall Street Journal is verkocht aan Murdoch. Commentaar van Scott [...]

]]> By: Vip http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/01/newsroom-diaspora/comment-page-1/#comment-903 Vip Thu, 02 Aug 2007 07:22:51 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1352#comment-903 The thing is, WSJ internal opinions aside, for customers, Murdoch has killed the goose that laid the golden egg: WSJ has value because of its rep for accurate, factual reporting. Now that Rupert has gotten his mitts on the goose, who's still going to trust the WSJ? No intelligent person. Result: no trust, no rep, no goods, no value. By tainting the Journal with his dirty hands, Rupert turned the WSJ into another lousy spinoff of the Simpsons (which, as the original, is unsurpassed and deserves their movie hit). The other spinoff of the Simpsons, Fox News, is a lousy copy. WSJ will be even lousier still. The thing is, WSJ internal opinions aside, for customers, Murdoch has killed the goose that laid the golden egg: WSJ has value because of its rep for accurate, factual reporting. Now that Rupert has gotten his mitts on the goose, who’s still going to trust the WSJ? No intelligent person. Result: no trust, no rep, no goods, no value. By tainting the Journal with his dirty hands, Rupert turned the WSJ into another lousy spinoff of the Simpsons (which, as the original, is unsurpassed and deserves their movie hit). The other spinoff of the Simpsons, Fox News, is a lousy copy. WSJ will be even lousier still.

]]> By: Tim http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/01/newsroom-diaspora/comment-page-1/#comment-904 Tim Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:18:34 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1352#comment-904 Nice essay, and congratulations for having the guts to walk the walk, as well as talking the talk. Nice essay, and congratulations for having the guts to walk the walk, as well as talking the talk.

]]> By: Murdoch : Hunter and Associates http://www.wordyard.com/2007/08/01/newsroom-diaspora/comment-page-1/#comment-905 Murdoch : Hunter and Associates Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:27:38 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1352#comment-905 [...] The truth is that most professional journalists in the U.S. have lived in a cocoon for decades. The so-called Chinese wall that separates the newsroom from the business side is typically framed as a noble device for insuring that advertiser cash does not influence news coverage. That’s an important goal. But in practice these walls are only as strong as the ethical principles of those who maintain them. Pair a bullying publisher with a weak-willed editor and no wall will help. - Murdoch, the Journal, and the newsroom diaspora [...] [...] The truth is that most professional journalists in the U.S. have lived in a cocoon for decades. The so-called Chinese wall that separates the newsroom from the business side is typically framed as a noble device for insuring that advertiser cash does not influence news coverage. That’s an important goal. But in practice these walls are only as strong as the ethical principles of those who maintain them. Pair a bullying publisher with a weak-willed editor and no wall will help. – Murdoch, the Journal, and the newsroom diaspora [...]

]]>