http://www.wordyard.com/2007/06/23/conversations-with-corporations/ Technology, politics, culture Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:27:40 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 http://www.wordyard.com/2007/06/23/conversations-with-corporations/#comment-787 » News to know: Spokesblogs; social networking sweepstakes; iPhone countdown | Between the Lines | ZDNet.com Mon, 25 Jun 2007 11:42:51 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1322#comment-787 [...] Scott Rosenberg [...] [...] Scott Rosenberg [...]

]]> http://www.wordyard.com/2007/06/23/conversations-with-corporations/#comment-789 Webomaticomic: The People Ready Three Way Conversation » Webomatica - tech, movies, music blog Sun, 24 Jun 2007 20:33:53 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1322#comment-789 [...] be somewhat fair): ChasNote, Brad Linder, Newsome.org, How To Split An Atom, Jackie Danicki, A VC, Scott Rosenberg, Adrants, [...] [...] be somewhat fair): ChasNote, Brad Linder, Newsome.org, How To Split An Atom, Jackie Danicki, A VC, Scott Rosenberg, Adrants, [...]

]]> http://www.wordyard.com/2007/06/23/conversations-with-corporations/#comment-790 Scott Rosenberg Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:40:15 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1322#comment-790 Those are legal and financial constructs. Whatever rights a corporation may possess, how do you sit across a table -- or across a Web page -- and have a conversation with a corporation (or a "perpetual person")? You can do so with individuals who have names. But anyone who tells me I'm "talking with Microsoft" is speaking marketing double-talk. Those are legal and financial constructs. Whatever rights a corporation may possess, how do you sit across a table — or across a Web page — and have a conversation with a corporation (or a “perpetual person”)? You can do so with individuals who have names. But anyone who tells me I’m “talking with Microsoft” is speaking marketing double-talk.

]]> http://www.wordyard.com/2007/06/23/conversations-with-corporations/#comment-788 Peter Sun, 24 Jun 2007 12:52:43 +0000 http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1322#comment-788 corporations have _many_ more rights than persons. first, they are perpetual persons. second, they have more power than just a single person. corporations have _many_ more rights than persons. first, they are perpetual persons. second, they have more power than just a single person.

]]>