<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Amateur hour</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 06:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The blog-dimmed tide is loosed!</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The blog-dimmed tide is loosed!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 18:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1292#comment-669</guid>
		<description>[...] the front of this parade, debating anyone he can persuade to share a podium, is Andrew Keen, author of The Cult of the Amateur. Keen&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the front of this parade, debating anyone he can persuade to share a podium, is Andrew Keen, author of The Cult of the Amateur. Keen&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 995 &#171; dohhohh</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>995 &#171; dohhohh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 16:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1292#comment-671</guid>
		<description>[...] via scott rosenberg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via scott rosenberg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Twardzick</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/#comment-668</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Twardzick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 21:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1292#comment-668</guid>
		<description>Umm, that "Winer review" you point to was nothing of the sort. Come on, now. Even in this incredibly dumbed down era, a few lines of poorly constructed prose does not substitute for a review. That's fact. And my opinion is that Winer's a lightweight. His tired critiques of the establishment press seem fired by some deep sense of hurt (from his earlier experience as a Apple developer?) that he can't get over</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm, that &#8220;Winer review&#8221; you point to was nothing of the sort. Come on, now. Even in this incredibly dumbed down era, a few lines of poorly constructed prose does not substitute for a review. That&#8217;s fact. And my opinion is that Winer&#8217;s a lightweight. His tired critiques of the establishment press seem fired by some deep sense of hurt (from his earlier experience as a Apple developer?) that he can&#8217;t get over</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amateur Hour &#171; Scobleizer</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Amateur Hour &#171; Scobleizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1292#comment-670</guid>
		<description>[...] Anyway, Dan Farber reports on the Sunday debate. So does Scott Roseberg. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Anyway, Dan Farber reports on the Sunday debate. So does Scott Roseberg. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Media literacy in a media saturated world &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Media literacy in a media saturated world &#124; Between the Lines &#124; ZDNet.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 23:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1292#comment-674</guid>
		<description>[...] also: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s post on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s post on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 04:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1292#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Thanks for speaking up, Grace! Sorry I missed your name first time around -- I'm adding it to the post now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for speaking up, Grace! Sorry I missed your name first time around &#8212; I&#8217;m adding it to the post now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GraceD</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/#comment-672</link>
		<dc:creator>GraceD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 03:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1292#comment-672</guid>
		<description>“I don’t know what Internet you guys are on”

That smartass mommyblogger would be me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I don’t know what Internet you guys are on”</p>
<p>That smartass mommyblogger would be me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Winer</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/05/20/amateur-hour/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Winer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 23:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1292#comment-667</guid>
		<description>Bloggers don't have the travel budget, but we don't need it, because we're already there.

Reporters think we're trying to be what they are, but this is wrong, false, incorrect.

We're the sources.

I wrote about this first, interestingly, in response to a Salon press release saying you guys were sending a reporter to Bosnia (I think). I said, we're already there.

It's an important perspective-shift, that was what was wrong in most of the comment on the panel last night, they saw things from the point of view of reporters, even Scoble does this these days. Bloggers are not reporters. Not not not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloggers don&#8217;t have the travel budget, but we don&#8217;t need it, because we&#8217;re already there.</p>
<p>Reporters think we&#8217;re trying to be what they are, but this is wrong, false, incorrect.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re the sources.</p>
<p>I wrote about this first, interestingly, in response to a Salon press release saying you guys were sending a reporter to Bosnia (I think). I said, we&#8217;re already there.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an important perspective-shift, that was what was wrong in most of the comment on the panel last night, they saw things from the point of view of reporters, even Scoble does this these days. Bloggers are not reporters. Not not not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
