<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some early returns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2007/01/13/early-returns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/01/13/early-returns/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Mace</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2007/01/13/early-returns/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Mace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 18:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1208#comment-466</guid>
		<description>MySpace and YouTube were easier to build than they were innovative. If there was anything hard about creating them, it was taking concepts from previous Web sites such as GeoCities and OurMedia and making them brain-dead simple. Timing also played a role with MySpace and YouTube. They hit their stride just as high-speed Internet really took off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MySpace and YouTube were easier to build than they were innovative. If there was anything hard about creating them, it was taking concepts from previous Web sites such as GeoCities and OurMedia and making them brain-dead simple. Timing also played a role with MySpace and YouTube. They hit their stride just as high-speed Internet really took off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
