<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush&#8217;s LBJ moment: Thomas Powers on Robert Gates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2006/11/30/bush-lbj-moment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/11/30/bush-lbj-moment/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/11/30/bush-lbj-moment/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 05:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1177#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting that transcript. It's still amazing to me how accurate a prognosis that was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that transcript. It&#8217;s still amazing to me how accurate a prognosis that was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahler 3</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/11/30/bush-lbj-moment/#comment-372</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahler 3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 02:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1177#comment-372</guid>
		<description>Powers is a great writer. Just finished his Richard Helms bio, "The Man Who Kept the Secrets". Rather than a bio it's really a history of the CIA up to 1979 throught the prism of Helms. the Church Committee findings, and watergate. Great book. I'm sure we're going to see a replay of many of the events from the period (1974-1979). Here's some of Power's thoughts from the fresh air interview.
Terry Gross: If we create a new government[in Iraq], and the government is as you describe it, more of a client government, do you think that government is going to be under attack by other Iraqis or by terrorists from other countries?

Powers: It is hard to say when the trouble will begin. You know the thing that worries me about this whole episode is the magnitude of the grand scheme that the Bush Administration has dreamed up for transforming the political landscape of the Middle East. Big ideas are the ones that give you the most trouble. Trying to make the world perfect just leads to disaster in my opinion. And I think that is the record of human history. Whenever we've engaged in a really big endeavor, trouble comes. Now exactly when that is going to happen I don't know.
There is going to be some kind of government there, we're going to be there. Eventually the fighting stops and the dust settles, everything is quiet for awhile and for a time it looks like "Gee, this wasn't going to be so hard, this is going to be a big success."  But you have changed the fundamental relationships of people there and gradually they realize what the limits of their actions are and they realize, "Well we can't have any military forces with tanks attacking the Americans but it isn't that hard to sneak up on them in the streets." I think an endless amount of trouble will begin to bubble forth. I figure we will have a month of war, then a month of indecision, and we will have a couple months where everything looks pretty good and then after that things are going to go down hill. It's gonna be trouble and it's gonna be money and it will take a generation to resolve it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Powers is a great writer. Just finished his Richard Helms bio, &#8220;The Man Who Kept the Secrets&#8221;. Rather than a bio it&#8217;s really a history of the CIA up to 1979 throught the prism of Helms. the Church Committee findings, and watergate. Great book. I&#8217;m sure we&#8217;re going to see a replay of many of the events from the period (1974-1979). Here&#8217;s some of Power&#8217;s thoughts from the fresh air interview.<br />
Terry Gross: If we create a new government[in Iraq], and the government is as you describe it, more of a client government, do you think that government is going to be under attack by other Iraqis or by terrorists from other countries?</p>
<p>Powers: It is hard to say when the trouble will begin. You know the thing that worries me about this whole episode is the magnitude of the grand scheme that the Bush Administration has dreamed up for transforming the political landscape of the Middle East. Big ideas are the ones that give you the most trouble. Trying to make the world perfect just leads to disaster in my opinion. And I think that is the record of human history. Whenever we&#8217;ve engaged in a really big endeavor, trouble comes. Now exactly when that is going to happen I don&#8217;t know.<br />
There is going to be some kind of government there, we&#8217;re going to be there. Eventually the fighting stops and the dust settles, everything is quiet for awhile and for a time it looks like &#8220;Gee, this wasn&#8217;t going to be so hard, this is going to be a big success.&#8221;  But you have changed the fundamental relationships of people there and gradually they realize what the limits of their actions are and they realize, &#8220;Well we can&#8217;t have any military forces with tanks attacking the Americans but it isn&#8217;t that hard to sneak up on them in the streets.&#8221; I think an endless amount of trouble will begin to bubble forth. I figure we will have a month of war, then a month of indecision, and we will have a couple months where everything looks pretty good and then after that things are going to go down hill. It&#8217;s gonna be trouble and it&#8217;s gonna be money and it will take a generation to resolve it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/11/30/bush-lbj-moment/#comment-371</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 16:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1177#comment-371</guid>
		<description>spooky indeed!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spooky indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Triskele</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/11/30/bush-lbj-moment/#comment-370</link>
		<dc:creator>Triskele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 13:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1177#comment-370</guid>
		<description>Well, this is bizarre.

So I'm spending this weekend finally reading Ricks' Fiasco,  and it got me thinking about this interview I'd heard on Fresh Air several years ago by Thomas Powers... someone who had gotten it almost exactly right.  Spookily accurate, as you say.

And I was wondering why I haven't heard from him on NPR or seen him on the cable news shows since then.   I googled Thomas Powers and Fresh Air in order to find out the date of the interview and found a cache of your blog from 2003 which helped me track down the original interview (which I'm listening to now).

And then - not knowing your blog, but liking your earlier 2003 post on Powers - decided to check out if you're still blogging, and what about.

huh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is bizarre.</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m spending this weekend finally reading Ricks&#8217; Fiasco,  and it got me thinking about this interview I&#8217;d heard on Fresh Air several years ago by Thomas Powers&#8230; someone who had gotten it almost exactly right.  Spookily accurate, as you say.</p>
<p>And I was wondering why I haven&#8217;t heard from him on NPR or seen him on the cable news shows since then.   I googled Thomas Powers and Fresh Air in order to find out the date of the interview and found a cache of your blog from 2003 which helped me track down the original interview (which I&#8217;m listening to now).</p>
<p>And then - not knowing your blog, but liking your earlier 2003 post on Powers - decided to check out if you&#8217;re still blogging, and what about.</p>
<p>huh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
