<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Outliners then and now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 13:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jurgen Stephens</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-4560</link>
		<dc:creator>Jurgen Stephens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 12:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-4560</guid>
		<description>I use a program called ConnectedText that includes an outline tool. So I have the best of both worlds: outlines and wiki. I can import OPML files and create wiki entries for each item in my outline, expanding information without the need to create new branches in the hierarchy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a program called ConnectedText that includes an outline tool. So I have the best of both worlds: outlines and wiki. I can import OPML files and create wiki entries for each item in my outline, expanding information without the need to create new branches in the hierarchy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 00:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I've been practicing law for 29 years, and need to make and modify outlines quickly. I've tried ECCO, Notemap, and other outliners, but the hands-down champion for speed, flexibility and import/export capabilities is GrandView 2.0. Although DOS-based, it works well on XP Pro.

Unfortunately, Symantic stopped selling and supporting GrandView in 1992.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been practicing law for 29 years, and need to make and modify outlines quickly. I&#8217;ve tried ECCO, Notemap, and other outliners, but the hands-down champion for speed, flexibility and import/export capabilities is GrandView 2.0. Although DOS-based, it works well on XP Pro.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, Symantic stopped selling and supporting GrandView in 1992.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-84</guid>
		<description>ECCO Pro and SQLNotes both run well under Parallels ... ECCO Pro far outstrips any of the native Mac apps, most especially OmniOutliner.

Terry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ECCO Pro and SQLNotes both run well under Parallels &#8230; ECCO Pro far outstrips any of the native Mac apps, most especially OmniOutliner.</p>
<p>Terry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-82</guid>
		<description>I use notemap at work.  It's a pc-based program that works a lot like MORE.

I have returned to Macs for personal use after a long absence  They are still beautiful.  But I would love to have IN CONTROL or ecco pro.  Omni-outliner seems full featured at first glance, but I find it confusing and lacking very valuable tools that were present in IN CONTROL and ecco pro.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use notemap at work.  It&#8217;s a pc-based program that works a lot like MORE.</p>
<p>I have returned to Macs for personal use after a long absence  They are still beautiful.  But I would love to have IN CONTROL or ecco pro.  Omni-outliner seems full featured at first glance, but I find it confusing and lacking very valuable tools that were present in IN CONTROL and ecco pro.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Afifi</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Afifi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-80</guid>
		<description>I use a Mac and am a die hard IN CONTROL user which is long discontinued program that runs on OS9.  Haven't found anything yet that can touch IN CONTROL, so have been sticking with Mac computers that still run OS9.

If you haven't already seen it, there's a great recap of Outliners by Ted Goranson on ATPM http://www.atpm.com/9.11/atpo.shtml

I blogged a bit about IN CONTROL too:
http://www.fluteplayer.net/2007/02/in-control-35-anything-like-it-online.html

Hoping that somebody (if I had the coding chops, I'd do it!), will revive IN CONTROL as there's a bunch of 'us' who really don't want to use anything else!

anyhow...

Thanks!

-Bob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a Mac and am a die hard IN CONTROL user which is long discontinued program that runs on OS9.  Haven&#8217;t found anything yet that can touch IN CONTROL, so have been sticking with Mac computers that still run OS9.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t already seen it, there&#8217;s a great recap of Outliners by Ted Goranson on ATPM <a href="http://www.atpm.com/9.11/atpo.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.atpm.com/9.11/atpo.shtml</a></p>
<p>I blogged a bit about IN CONTROL too:<br />
<a href="http://www.fluteplayer.net/2007/02/in-control-35-anything-like-it-online.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.fluteplayer.net/2007/02/in-control-35-anything-like-it-online.html</a></p>
<p>Hoping that somebody (if I had the coding chops, I&#8217;d do it!), will revive IN CONTROL as there&#8217;s a bunch of &#8216;us&#8217; who really don&#8217;t want to use anything else!</p>
<p>anyhow&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>-Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 03:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-78</guid>
		<description>John wrote:
but I was on a Mac when it was popular and now that I’ve returned to the Mac
---------------------

BTW SQLNotes runs on a Mac under Parallels. www.sqlnotes.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John wrote:<br />
but I was on a Mac when it was popular and now that I’ve returned to the Mac<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>BTW SQLNotes runs on a Mac under Parallels. <a href="http://www.sqlnotes.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.sqlnotes.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Faughnan</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>John Faughnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Count me an outliner fan to the max:

http://www.faughnan.com/more

GrandView belongs in any history of Outliners btw as does FullWrite Professional:

http://tech.kateva.org/2007/08/rescuing-data-from-1993-archival.html

(note how tiny FW is, still runs in Classic!).

In terms of WP/outliner integration things are truly weak now (curse you Microsoft Word!!), but the brand new Nisus Writer Pro has some interesting outliner like features. I'm still using Express, but I'll switch to Pro after it's had a few more months of testing (no great rush).

I do miss MORE, nothing like it today, really. I'd have loved Ecco too, but I was on a Mac when it was popular and now that I've returned to the Mac it wouldn't help me. OmniOutliner Pro is very good, but it's not enough of a wordprocessor for my current uses, and I never got the hang of its style model.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me an outliner fan to the max:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.faughnan.com/more" rel="nofollow">http://www.faughnan.com/more</a></p>
<p>GrandView belongs in any history of Outliners btw as does FullWrite Professional:</p>
<p><a href="http://tech.kateva.org/2007/08/rescuing-data-from-1993-archival.html" rel="nofollow">http://tech.kateva.org/2007/08/rescuing-data-from-1993-archival.html</a></p>
<p>(note how tiny FW is, still runs in Classic!).</p>
<p>In terms of WP/outliner integration things are truly weak now (curse you Microsoft Word!!), but the brand new Nisus Writer Pro has some interesting outliner like features. I&#8217;m still using Express, but I&#8217;ll switch to Pro after it&#8217;s had a few more months of testing (no great rush).</p>
<p>I do miss MORE, nothing like it today, really. I&#8217;d have loved Ecco too, but I was on a Mac when it was popular and now that I&#8217;ve returned to the Mac it wouldn&#8217;t help me. OmniOutliner Pro is very good, but it&#8217;s not enough of a wordprocessor for my current uses, and I never got the hang of its style model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Reading this thread, one thing is clear, you can't all be wrong. So the outliners and the non-outliners both have valid points. Both 1-pane and 2-panes outliners have specific uses.

The ideal information management app must be an excellent outliner with multiple parents support (when required), an excellent linker (i.e. like the web), an excellent tagger, an excellent editor supporting rich text editing in the outline AND in a second rich text window, support flat and tree-structured display with or without a data grid, usable as a flexible database supporting calculations and reporting and an have excellent search engine. Plus it needs to have a customizable UI, support drag-drop and have links to all other major apps.

Only if you have all these features can you adequately organize all kinds of information, not just a specific kind.
Yes Ecco is/was an excellent outliner+data grid, but had no item to item linker, and forced structured tree representation, which may or may not suit the specific information or the way a particular person wants to work/organize its information. It had rich text outlines and customizable UI but for the rest, the above features were not great or not there at all.

This is where SQLNotes (code name) comes in. It has ALL of the above features. It was inspired by Ecco, but it took the concept much further. The current beta available at www.sqlnotes.net is very stable. You are all welcomed to download a free copy.

http://www.sqlnotes.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this thread, one thing is clear, you can&#8217;t all be wrong. So the outliners and the non-outliners both have valid points. Both 1-pane and 2-panes outliners have specific uses.</p>
<p>The ideal information management app must be an excellent outliner with multiple parents support (when required), an excellent linker (i.e. like the web), an excellent tagger, an excellent editor supporting rich text editing in the outline AND in a second rich text window, support flat and tree-structured display with or without a data grid, usable as a flexible database supporting calculations and reporting and an have excellent search engine. Plus it needs to have a customizable UI, support drag-drop and have links to all other major apps.</p>
<p>Only if you have all these features can you adequately organize all kinds of information, not just a specific kind.<br />
Yes Ecco is/was an excellent outliner+data grid, but had no item to item linker, and forced structured tree representation, which may or may not suit the specific information or the way a particular person wants to work/organize its information. It had rich text outlines and customizable UI but for the rest, the above features were not great or not there at all.</p>
<p>This is where SQLNotes (code name) comes in. It has ALL of the above features. It was inspired by Ecco, but it took the concept much further. The current beta available at <a href="http://www.sqlnotes.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.sqlnotes.net</a> is very stable. You are all welcomed to download a free copy.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sqlnotes.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.sqlnotes.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 23:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Boy! You guys are really hooked on ECCO PRO! There's nothing to pull you away, I guess... if that makes you happy, well, that's fine.

Maybe you could also look at this multi-tabbed outliner: TreeDBNotes PRO.

http://www.mytreedb.com/treedbnotes_pro.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy! You guys are really hooked on ECCO PRO! There&#8217;s nothing to pull you away, I guess&#8230; if that makes you happy, well, that&#8217;s fine.</p>
<p>Maybe you could also look at this multi-tabbed outliner: TreeDBNotes PRO.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mytreedb.com/treedbnotes_pro.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.mytreedb.com/treedbnotes_pro.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/26/outliners/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1079#comment-75</guid>
		<description>EccoPro REVITALIZED!!!


amazing new powers...


check them out (for free!!) at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ecco_pro/


also..

http://eccoTools.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EccoPro REVITALIZED!!!</p>
<p>amazing new powers&#8230;</p>
<p>check them out (for free!!) at <a href="http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ecco_pro/" rel="nofollow">http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/ecco_pro/</a></p>
<p>also..</p>
<p><a href="http://eccoTools.com" rel="nofollow">http://eccoTools.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
