<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fallows, PIMs and Chandler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/11/fallows-pims-and-chandler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/11/fallows-pims-and-chandler/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve George</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2006/07/11/fallows-pims-and-chandler/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=1064#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Good luck with writing the book, I'll be very interested in it when you publish.  I've been keeping an eye on Chandler for what seems like ages.  It's been very disappointing that they've taken so long to get anything usable out there.  I'm sure it's a very complex undertaking but I wonder if they've managed to fully use the open source philosophy.  Although they have many of the trappings, the part where they attract participants and 'get the code out there' seems to be missing.  Oddly the same lack of external contributors seems to have happened to Hula as well - so perhaps the knowledge domain is a contributory factor.

Still hoping they come through!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with writing the book, I&#8217;ll be very interested in it when you publish.  I&#8217;ve been keeping an eye on Chandler for what seems like ages.  It&#8217;s been very disappointing that they&#8217;ve taken so long to get anything usable out there.  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s a very complex undertaking but I wonder if they&#8217;ve managed to fully use the open source philosophy.  Although they have many of the trappings, the part where they attract participants and &#8216;get the code out there&#8217; seems to be missing.  Oddly the same lack of external contributors seems to have happened to Hula as well - so perhaps the knowledge domain is a contributory factor.</p>
<p>Still hoping they come through!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
