<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If it quacks like a quagmire&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wordyard.com/2003/06/19/if-it-quacks-like-a-quagmire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2003/06/19/if-it-quacks-like-a-quagmire/</link>
	<description>Technology, politics, culture</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NYT NSFW</title>
		<link>http://www.wordyard.com/2003/06/19/if-it-quacks-like-a-quagmire/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Rosenberg&#8217;s Wordyard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NYT NSFW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wordyard.com/?p=395#comment-11</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in 2003 my jaw dropped to find the word &#8220;asses&#8221; on the New York Times&#8217; front page. Today, it dropped again: There, in Tom Friedman&#8217;s column, was the full quotation from President Bush&#8217;s now notorious open-mike moment at the summit in Russia in all its barnyard epithet glory. The Times hadn&#8217;t published Bush&#8217;s &#8220;shit&#8221; in its news columns, which bowdlerized the president, referring to his choice word as &#8220;a vulgarity.&#8221; But Friedman boldly seized the four-letter moment in his op-ed column. I assume this is some by-product of the bureaucratic Maginot Line that separates the Times&#8217; news department from its editorial and op-ed pages. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in 2003 my jaw dropped to find the word &#8220;asses&#8221; on the New York Times&#8217; front page. Today, it dropped again: There, in Tom Friedman&#8217;s column, was the full quotation from President Bush&#8217;s now notorious open-mike moment at the summit in Russia in all its barnyard epithet glory. The Times hadn&#8217;t published Bush&#8217;s &#8220;shit&#8221; in its news columns, which bowdlerized the president, referring to his choice word as &#8220;a vulgarity.&#8221; But Friedman boldly seized the four-letter moment in his op-ed column. I assume this is some by-product of the bureaucratic Maginot Line that separates the Times&#8217; news department from its editorial and op-ed pages. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
